IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i2p417-d476210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Overview of the Motivation of Advance Care Planning: A Study from a Medical Center in Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Yi-Jhen He

    (Department of Family Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112, Taiwan)

  • Ming-Hwai Lin

    (Department of Family Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112, Taiwan
    School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan)

  • Jo-Lan Hsu

    (Department of Family Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112, Taiwan)

  • Bo-Ren Cheng

    (Department of Family Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112, Taiwan
    School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan)

  • Tzeng-Ji Chen

    (Department of Family Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112, Taiwan
    School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan)

  • Shinn-Jang Hwang

    (Department of Family Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112, Taiwan
    School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan)

Abstract

(1) Background: Since Taiwan’s Patient Right to Autonomy Act took effect in 2019, up to ten thousand declarants have participated in advance care planning (ACP) and have signed advance directives (ADs). Relative to the entire population of Taiwan, only a small percentage have completed ACP. This study sought to understand the motivations of Taiwanese who have participated in ACP, so as to increase the percentage of individuals participating in ACP and signing ADs; (2) Objectives: To understand the motivations that drive Taiwanese individuals to participate in ACP discussions.; (3) Methods: A retrospective secondary data analysis was performed in this study. The participants consisted of declarants who completed their ACP at a medical center in Taiwan in 2019; (4) Results: During the study period, 946 individuals completed their ACP. Of those declarants, 66.7% were over 60 years of age; 66.5% completed the process in groups of three or more; 49.5% completed their ACP free of charge; and 35 declarants had designated a health care agent (HCA). The declarants’ four main motivations for participating in ACP were “looking forward to dying with dignity,” “making end-of-life preparations,” “fear of being a social and economic burden on family members,” and “reluctance to let family members take on the responsibility of making decisions.” Furthermore, statistically significant differences were observed between the declarants in terms of gender, age, designation of an HCA, and motivations for participating in ACP. Females, declarants aged below 60 years, and declarants with a designated HCA tended to participate in ACP due to “reluctance to let family members to take on the responsibility of making decisions”. Males, declarants aged above 60 years, and declarants without an HCA came for ACP because of “fear of being a social and economic burden on family members”. (5) Conclusions: The main motivations of Taiwanese individuals who sought ACP were to die with dignity and to have an early understanding of end-of-life treatment and care models. Secondly, these individuals hoped that their families would not have to take on the responsibility of making decisions. They also did not want to impact their families socially and economically. In this regard, providing economic subsidies might enhance the Taiwanese public’s intentions to seek ACP discussions on their own initiative.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi-Jhen He & Ming-Hwai Lin & Jo-Lan Hsu & Bo-Ren Cheng & Tzeng-Ji Chen & Shinn-Jang Hwang, 2021. "Overview of the Motivation of Advance Care Planning: A Study from a Medical Center in Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-12, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:2:p:417-:d:476210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/2/417/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/2/417/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wan-Na Sun & Hsin-Tien Hsu & Nai-Ying Ko & Yu-Tung Huang, 2020. "Decision-Making Processes in Surrogates of Cancer Patients in a Taiwan Intensive Care Unit," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-15, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hung-Cheng Chen & Chien-Yi Wu & Hui-Ya Hsieh & Jiun-Shiuan He & Shang-Jyh Hwang & Hui-Min Hsieh, 2021. "Predictors and Assessment of Hospice Use for End-Stage Renal Disease Patients in Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Noorhazlina Ali & Philomena Anthony & Wee Shiong Lim & Mei Sian Chong & Edward Wing Hong Poon & Vicki Drury & Mark Chan, 2021. "Exploring Differential Perceptions and Barriers to Advance Care Planning in Dementia among Asian Patient–Caregiver Dyads—A Mixed-Methods Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-15, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:2:p:417-:d:476210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.