IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i2p415-d476172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Peer Victimisation in Early Childhood; Observations of Participant Roles and Sex Differences

Author

Listed:
  • Claire P. Monks

    (School of Human Sciences, Institute for Lifecourse Development, University of Greenwich, London SE10 9LS, UK)

  • Peter K. Smith

    (Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, London SE14 6NW, UK)

  • Kat Kucaba

    (School of Human Sciences, Institute for Lifecourse Development, University of Greenwich, London SE10 9LS, UK)

Abstract

During middle childhood and adolescence, victimisation appears to be a group process involving different participant roles. However, peer reports with younger children (four to six years old) have failed to identify the participant roles of assistant (to the bully) reinforcers or defenders with much reliability. This may be because peer victimisation is a more dyadic process among younger children (behavioural reality), or because of limitations in young children’s cognitive capacity to identify these behaviours (cognitive limitations). The findings of an observational study which examined the group nature of peer victimisation among young children are presented. Observations were made of 56 children aged four and five years using time sampling during free play at school (totalling 43.5 h of observation). Records were made of their behaviour when an onlooker witnessed aggression by others, and also of others’ behaviour when they were being aggressive or being victimised. Although children other than the aggressor and target were present in nearly two thirds of the episodes of peer victimisation observed, few exhibited behavioural responses in line with the assistant, reinforcer or defender roles. This supports the behavioural reality rather than the cognitive limitations explanation. Sex differences were observed in types of aggression displayed by children, with boys more likely than girls to be physically aggressive. Children were less likely to be aggressive to other-sex peers and were most likely to be victimised by children of the same sex as them. There were also sex differences in children’s onlooker behaviour. The implications for our understanding of the development of peer victimisation and bullying in children are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Claire P. Monks & Peter K. Smith & Kat Kucaba, 2021. "Peer Victimisation in Early Childhood; Observations of Participant Roles and Sex Differences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-12, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:2:p:415-:d:476172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/2/415/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/2/415/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Raúl Navarro & Elisa Larrañaga & Santiago Yubero & Beatriz Víllora, 2022. "Families, Parenting and Aggressive Preschoolers: A Scoping Review of Studies Examining Family Variables Related to Preschool Aggression," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-34, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:2:p:415-:d:476172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.