IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i24p13133-d700969.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholders′ Perceptions of Environmental and Public Health Risks Associated with Hydrocarbon Activities in and around the Vasilikos Energy Center, Cyprus

Author

Listed:
  • Eleni G. Kleovoulou

    (Cyprus International Institute for Environmental and Public Health, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol 3041, Cyprus)

  • Corina Konstantinou

    (Cyprus International Institute for Environmental and Public Health, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol 3041, Cyprus)

  • Andria Constantinou

    (Cyprus International Institute for Environmental and Public Health, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol 3041, Cyprus)

  • Eelco Kuijpers

    (The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research TNO, 3584 CB Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Miranda Loh

    (Institute of Occupational Medicine (IOM), Edinburgh EH14 4AP, UK)

  • Karen S. Galea

    (Institute of Occupational Medicine (IOM), Edinburgh EH14 4AP, UK)

  • Rob Stierum

    (The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research TNO, 3584 CB Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Anjoeka Pronk

    (The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research TNO, 3584 CB Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Konstantinos C. Makris

    (Cyprus International Institute for Environmental and Public Health, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol 3041, Cyprus)

Abstract

The Vasilikos Energy Center (VEC) is a large hydrocarbon industrial hub actively operating in Cyprus. There is strong public interest by the communities surrounding VEC to engage with all stakeholders towards the sustainable development of hydrocarbon in the region. The methodological framework of the exposome concept would allow for the holistic identification of all relevant environmental exposures by engaging the most relevant stakeholders in industrially contaminated sites. The main objectives of this study were to: (i) evaluate the stakeholders’ perceptions of the environmental and public health risks and recommended actions associated with the VEC hydrocarbon activities, and (ii) assess the stakeholders’ understanding and interest towards exposome-based technologies for use in oil and gas applications. Methods: Six major groups of stakeholders were identified: local authorities, small-medium industries (SMIs) (including multi-national companies), small-medium enterprises (SMEs), academia/professional associations, government, and the general public residing in the communities surrounding the VEC. During 2019–2021, a suite of stakeholder engagement initiatives was deployed, including semi-structured interviews (n = 32 ), a community survey for the general public ( n = 309), technical meetings, and workshops ( n = 4 ). Results from the semi-structured interviews, technical meetings and workshops were analyzed through thematic analysis and results from the community survey were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: Almost all stakeholders expressed the need for the implementation of a systematic health monitoring system for the VEC broader area and its surrounding residential communities, including frequent measurements of air pollutant emissions. Moreover, stricter policies by the government about licensing and monitoring of hydrocarbon activities and proper communication to the public and the mass media emerged as important needs. The exposome concept was not practiced by the SMEs, but SMIs showed willingness to use it in the future as part of their research and development activities. Conclusions: The sustainable development of hydrocarbon exploitation and processing prospects for Cyprus involves the VEC. Continuous and active collaboration and mutual feedback among all stakeholders involved with the VEC is essential, as this may allow future environmental and occupational health initiatives to be formalized.

Suggested Citation

  • Eleni G. Kleovoulou & Corina Konstantinou & Andria Constantinou & Eelco Kuijpers & Miranda Loh & Karen S. Galea & Rob Stierum & Anjoeka Pronk & Konstantinos C. Makris, 2021. "Stakeholders′ Perceptions of Environmental and Public Health Risks Associated with Hydrocarbon Activities in and around the Vasilikos Energy Center, Cyprus," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:13133-:d:700969
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/13133/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/13133/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Toddi Steelman & Sarah McCaffrey, 2013. "Best practices in risk and crisis communication: Implications for natural hazards management," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 65(1), pages 683-705, January.
    2. Darshana Rajapaksa & Moinul Islam & Shunsuke Managi, 2018. "Pro-Environmental Behavior: The Role of Public Perception in Infrastructure and the Social Factors for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Mikyong Shin & Angela K. Werner & Heather Strosnider & Lisa B. Hines & Lina Balluz & Fuyuen Y. Yip, 2019. "Public Perceptions of Environmental Public Health Risks in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-13, March.
    4. Lyle R. Turner & Katarzyna Alderman & Des Connell & Shilu Tong, 2013. "Motivators and Barriers to Incorporating Climate Change-Related Health Risks in Environmental Health Impact Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-13, March.
    5. repec:taf:jriskr:v:7:y:2004:i:7-8:p:705-729 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Maria Uhl & Ricardo R. Santos & Joana Costa & Osvaldo Santos & Ana Virgolino & David S. Evans & Cora Murray & Maurice Mulcahy & Dorothy Ubong & Ovnair Sepai & Joana Lobo Vicente & Michaela Leitner & S, 2021. "Chemical Exposure: European Citizens’ Perspectives, Trust, and Concerns on Human Biomonitoring Initiatives, Information Needs, and Scientific Results," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-17, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Assem Abu Hatab & Padmaja Ravula & Swamikannu Nedumaran & Carl-Johan Lagerkvist, 2022. "Perceptions of the impacts of urban sprawl among urban and peri-urban dwellers of Hyderabad, India: a Latent class clustering analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(11), pages 12787-12812, November.
    2. Juan David Gómez-Quintero & Pilar Gargallo Valero & Jesús Miguel Álvarez, 2019. "Who Supports International Development Cooperation in Times of Crisis? Public Opinion in Rural Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Samar Ben Romdhane & Sang Lee & Salem Al-Shaebi, 2023. "Enhancing Sustainability Communication among UAE’s Higher Education Students: The Relationship between Sustainable Living Knowledge and Intention to Live Sustainably," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Mst Asma Khatun & Shibly Shahrier & Koji Kotani, 2020. "Cooperation and cognition gaps for salinity: A field experiment of information provision," Working Papers SDES-2020-4, Kochi University of Technology, School of Economics and Management, revised Jun 2020.
    5. Hasan Fehmi Topal & Dexter V. L. Hunt & Christopher D. F. Rogers, 2021. "Exploring Urban Sustainability Understanding and Behaviour: A Systematic Review towards a Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-33, January.
    6. John McClure & David Johnston & Liv Henrich & Taciano Milfont & Julia Becker, 2015. "When a hazard occurs where it is not expected: risk judgments about different regions after the Christchurch earthquakes," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 75(1), pages 635-652, January.
    7. Natalia Solano-Pinto & Dunia Garrido & Felipe Gértrudix-Barrio & Raquel Fernández-Cézar, 2020. "Is Knowledge of Circular Economy, Pro-Environmental Behavior, Satisfaction with Life, and Beliefs a Predictor of Connectedness to Nature in Rural Children and Adolescents? A Pilot Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-13, November.
    8. Melissa Nursey-Bray & Robert Palmer & Bridie Meyer-Mclean & Thomas Wanner & Cris Birzer, 2019. "The Fear of Not Flying: Achieving Sustainable Academic Plane Travel in Higher Education Based on Insights from South Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-22, May.
    9. Simangele Dlamini & Solomon G. Tesfamichael & Yegnanew Shiferaw & Tholang Mokhele, 2020. "Determinants of Environmental Perceptions and Attitudes in a Socio-Demographically Diverse Urban Setup: The Case of Gauteng Province, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, April.
    10. Emily Heaney & Laura Hunter & Angus Clulow & Devin Bowles & Sotiris Vardoulakis, 2021. "Efficacy of Communication Techniques and Health Outcomes of Bushfire Smoke Exposure: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-14, October.
    11. Travis Paveglio & Catrin Edgeley, 2017. "Community diversity and hazard events: understanding the evolution of local approaches to wildfire," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(2), pages 1083-1108, June.
    12. Khuc, Quy Van & Tran, Phuong-Mai, 2022. "Framework for energy transformation," OSF Preprints et3r2, Center for Open Science.
    13. Tianzhuo Liu & Huifang Jiao, 2018. "How does information affect fire risk reduction behaviors? Mediating effects of cognitive processes and subjective knowledge," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 90(3), pages 1461-1483, February.
    14. Amoako, Frimpong & Asuamah Yeboah, Samuel, 2023. ""Community Voices in Control: A Systematic Review of Local Representation's Influence on RCB Governance Structure’’," MPRA Paper 118629, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Sep 2023.
    15. Toddi Steelman & Sarah McCaffrey & Anne-Lise Velez & Jason Briefel, 2015. "What information do people use, trust, and find useful during a disaster? Evidence from five large wildfires," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 76(1), pages 615-634, March.
    16. Matthew L. Richardson & Ashley D. Milton & Elgloria Harrison, 2020. "People with Different Educational Attainment in Washington, DC, USA have Differential Knowledge and Perceptions about Environmental Issues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, March.
    17. Junichi Hirose & Koji Kotani & Yoshinori Nakagawa, 2021. "Is Climate Change Induced by Humans? The Impact of the Gap in Perceptions on Cooperation," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 391-413, October.
    18. Almulhim, Abdulaziz I., 2022. "Understanding public awareness and attitudes toward renewable energy resources in Saudi Arabia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 572-582.
    19. Mark R. Kreider & Philip E. Higuera & Sean A. Parks & William L. Rice & Nadia White & Andrew J. Larson, 2024. "Fire suppression makes wildfires more severe and accentuates impacts of climate change and fuel accumulation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    20. Tan-Soo, Jie-Sheng & Li, Jun & Qin, Ping, 2023. "Individuals' and households' climate adaptation and mitigation behaviors: A systematic review," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:13133-:d:700969. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.