IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i24p12940-d697644.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Avoidant Coping of the Decision-Making Process on the Location of Care in Old Age: A Possible Conspiracy of Silence?

Author

Listed:
  • Gema Serrano-Gemes

    (Institute for Advanced Social Studies-Spanish National Research Council (IESA-CSIC), 14004 Córdoba, Spain
    Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), University of Cordoba (UCO), Reina Sofia University Hospital (HURS), 14004 Córdoba, Spain)

  • Isabel Gil

    (Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra, Unidade de Investigação em Ciências da Saúde: Enfermagem (UICISA: E), 3004-011 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Adriana Coelho

    (Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra, Unidade de Investigação em Ciências da Saúde: Enfermagem (UICISA: E), 3004-011 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Rafael Serrano-del-Rosal

    (Institute for Advanced Social Studies-Spanish National Research Council (IESA-CSIC), 14004 Córdoba, Spain)

Abstract

The conspiracy of silence is extremely important due to both its high incidence and its consequences. This process usually occurs in situations of palliative care, or death; however, this concept is also mentioned in the literature linked to other contexts. Therefore, our objective was to study whether the conspiracy of silence may be extrapolated to the context of decision-making on the location of care in old age. To this end, we first analyzed the in-depth semi structured qualitative interviews conducted with older people, caregivers, and professionals, about decision-making on the location of care in old age. Subsequently, a comparative analysis was performed between the basic elements of the conspiracy of silence and this decision-making. Our findings revealed an avoidance process developed by all three groups. Furthermore, this decision-making presents similarities with the conspiracy of silence in the process of avoidance coping and denial that is developed. However, there are significant differences, as information is not withheld from the older person, who has an active attitude in the process of avoidance. Decision-making on the location of care in old age does not exactly match the conspiracy of silence process, but it does seem to correspond to a pact of silence.

Suggested Citation

  • Gema Serrano-Gemes & Isabel Gil & Adriana Coelho & Rafael Serrano-del-Rosal, 2021. "Avoidant Coping of the Decision-Making Process on the Location of Care in Old Age: A Possible Conspiracy of Silence?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:12940-:d:697644
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/12940/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/12940/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olivia Ibañez-Masero & Inés María Carmona-Rega & María Dolores Ruiz-Fernández & Rocío Ortiz-Amo & José Cabrera-Troya & Ángela María Ortega-Galán, 2019. "Communicating Health Information at the End of Life: The Caregivers’ Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-11, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. María Dolores Ruiz-Fernández & Ángela María Ortega-Galán & Cayetano Fernández-Sola & José Manuel Hernández-Padilla & José Granero-Molina & Juan Diego Ramos-Pichardo, 2020. "Occupational Factors Associated with Health-Related Quality of Life in Nursing Professionals: A Multi-Centre Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-12, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:12940-:d:697644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.