IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i24p12889-d696790.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Evolution of Social Networks: A Ten-Year Longitudinal Analysis of an Agricultural, Fishing and Forestry Occupational Health Research Center

Author

Listed:
  • Melissa B. Scribani

    (Bassett Medical Center, Bassett Research Institute, Cooperstown, NY 13326, USA)

  • Pamela J. Tinc

    (Bassett Medical Center, Bassett Research Institute, Cooperstown, NY 13326, USA
    Northeast Center for Occupational Health and Safety in Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing, Cooperstown, NY 13326, USA)

  • Erika E. Scott

    (Bassett Medical Center, Bassett Research Institute, Cooperstown, NY 13326, USA
    Northeast Center for Occupational Health and Safety in Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing, Cooperstown, NY 13326, USA)

  • Julie A. Sorensen

    (Bassett Medical Center, Bassett Research Institute, Cooperstown, NY 13326, USA
    Northeast Center for Occupational Health and Safety in Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing, Cooperstown, NY 13326, USA)

  • Nancy H. Tallman

    (Bassett Medical Center, Bassett Research Institute, Cooperstown, NY 13326, USA)

  • Anne M. Gadomski

    (Bassett Medical Center, Bassett Research Institute, Cooperstown, NY 13326, USA)

Abstract

As part of our evaluation of the NIOSH-funded Northeast Center for Occupational Health and Safety: Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing (NEC), we present methodology, findings and the potential implications of a sequential social network analysis (SNA) conducted over ten years. Assessing the effectiveness of the center’s scientific projects was our overarching evaluation goal. The evaluation design employed SNA to (a) look at changes to the center’s network over time by visualizing relationships between center collaborators annually, (b) document collaborative ties and (c) identify particularly strong or weak areas of the network. Transdisciplinary social network criteria were applied to the SNA to examine the collaboration between center personnel, their partners and the industry groups they serve. SNA participants’ perspectives on the utility of the SNA were also summarized to assess their interest in ongoing SNA measures. Annual installments of the SNA (2011–2020) showed an expansion of the network with a 30% increase in membership from baseline, as well as an increase in total relational ties (any type of contact). SNA measures also indicated significant increases in co-publication, cross-sector and transdisciplinary ties. Overall, SNA is an effective tool in visualizing and sustaining an occupational safety and health research and outreach network. Its utility is limited by how ties are characterized, grant cycle timeframes and how SNA metrics relate to productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Melissa B. Scribani & Pamela J. Tinc & Erika E. Scott & Julie A. Sorensen & Nancy H. Tallman & Anne M. Gadomski, 2021. "Evaluating the Evolution of Social Networks: A Ten-Year Longitudinal Analysis of an Agricultural, Fishing and Forestry Occupational Health Research Center," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:12889-:d:696790
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/12889/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/12889/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Catherine Durose & Liz Richardson & Beth Perry, 2018. "Craft metrics to value co-production," Nature, Nature, vol. 562(7725), pages 32-33, October.
    2. Sarah A. Felknor & Jessica M. K. Streit & L. Casey Chosewood & Michelle McDaniel & Paul A. Schulte & George L. Delclos & on behalf of the Workshop Presenters and Participants, 2020. "How Will the Future of Work Shape the OSH Professional of the Future? A Workshop Summary," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-15, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aditya Sekhar Das & Arya Gangopadhyay & Zakir Husain, 2024. "Heterogeneity, incomplete information and efficiency: a longitudinal study of a students' network," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 44(1), pages 211-234.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul A. Schulte & Ivo Iavicoli & Luca Fontana & Stavroula Leka & Maureen F. Dollard & Acran Salmen-Navarro & Fernanda J. Salles & Kelly P. K. Olympio & Roberto Lucchini & Marilyn Fingerhut & Francesco, 2022. "Occupational Safety and Health Staging Framework for Decent Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-28, August.
    2. Yoko E. Fukumura & Julie McLaughlin Gray & Gale M. Lucas & Burcin Becerik-Gerber & Shawn C. Roll, 2021. "Worker Perspectives on Incorporating Artificial Intelligence into Office Workspaces: Implications for the Future of Office Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Jessica M. K. Streit & Sarah A. Felknor & Nicole T. Edwards & John Howard, 2021. "Leveraging Strategic Foresight to Advance Worker Safety, Health, and Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Amanda T. Lombard & Jai Clifford-Holmes & Victoria Goodall & Bernadette Snow & Hannah Truter & Patrick Vrancken & Peter J. S. Jones & Kevern Cochrane & Wesley Flannery & Christina Hicks & Lena Gippert, 2023. "Principles for transformative ocean governance," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(12), pages 1587-1599, December.
    5. Thomas Cunningham & Brenda Jacklitsch & Reid Richards, 2021. "Intermediary Perspectives on Total Worker Health in Small Businesses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Oskar Jonsson & Susanne Iwarsson, 2022. "Scrutinizing the collaboration criterion in research: how do policy ambitions play out in proposals and assessments?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(8), pages 4675-4696, August.
    7. Sarah A. Felknor & Jessica M. K. Streit & Michelle McDaniel & Paul A. Schulte & L. Casey Chosewood & George L. Delclos & on behalf of the Workshop Presenters and Participants, 2021. "How Will the Future of Work Shape OSH Research and Practice? A Workshop Summary," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-21, May.
    8. Paul A. Schulte & George L. Delclos & Sarah A. Felknor & Jessica M. K. Streit & Michelle McDaniel & L. Casey Chosewood & Lee S. Newman & Faiyaz A. Bhojani & Rene Pana-Cryan & Naomi G. Swanson, 2022. "Expanding the Focus of Occupational Safety and Health: Lessons from a Series of Linked Scientific Meetings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-21, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:12889-:d:696790. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.