IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i23p12553-d690342.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Obstetric Violence as an Infringement on Basic Bioethical Principles. Reflections Inspired by Focus Groups with Midwives

Author

Listed:
  • Júlia Martín-Badia

    (Department of Philosophy, University of Barcelona, 08001 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Noemí Obregón-Gutiérrez

    (University Hospital Parc Taulí, Sabadell, 08208 Barcelona, Spain
    The Nursing Council of Barcelona, 08019 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Josefina Goberna-Tricas

    (Department of Public Health, Mental Health and Perinatal Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, ADHUC–Research Center for Theory, Gender and Sexuality, University of Barcelona, 08907 Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract

Background: obstetric violence is still far too invisible; the word “violence” generates rejection and obstetric violence is complex to define and typify, as it is a subjective experience. It has been widely analyzed from legal, sociological, and clinical perspectives, but not equally so from the bioethical point of view. This article sets out to take a more in-depth look at the experiences of midwives in order to describe the ethical perspectives of obstetric violence. We intend to describe the effects that malpractice and violence within obstetric care have on American and European bioethical principles. Methodology: A qualitative methodology of the phenomenological tradition was used: 24 midwives participated in three focus groups. Results and Discussion: four categories were arrived at; they are “the maleficence of forgetting my vulnerability”, “beneficence requires respect for my integrity and dignity”, “my autonomy is being removed from me” and “a problem of social justice towards us, women”. Conclusion: obstetric violence infringes on the main bioethical principles (non-maleficence, beneficence, autonomy, justice, vulnerability, dignity, and integrity). Beyond whether it is called violence or not, what matters from an ethical perspective is that, as long as women have such negative experiences during pregnancy and childbirth, obstetric care needs better humanizing.

Suggested Citation

  • Júlia Martín-Badia & Noemí Obregón-Gutiérrez & Josefina Goberna-Tricas, 2021. "Obstetric Violence as an Infringement on Basic Bioethical Principles. Reflections Inspired by Focus Groups with Midwives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12553-:d:690342
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12553/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12553/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Desirée Mena-Tudela & Susana Iglesias-Casás & Víctor Manuel González-Chordá & María Jesús Valero-Chillerón & Laura Andreu-Pejó & Águeda Cervera-Gasch, 2021. "Obstetric Violence in Spain (Part III): Healthcare Professionals, Times, and Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-17, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Desirée Mena-Tudela & Susana Iglesias-Casas & Agueda Cervera-Gasch & Laura Andreu-Pejó & Victor Manuel González-Chordá & María Jesús Valero-Chillerón, 2022. "Breastfeeding and Obstetric Violence during the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in Spain: Maternal Perceptions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-10, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12553-:d:690342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.