IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i22p12205-d683988.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benchmarks for Needed Psychiatric Beds for the United States: A Test of a Predictive Analytics Model

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher G. Hudson

    (School of Social Work, Salem State University, Salem, MA 01970, USA)

Abstract

The ideal balanced mental health service system presupposes that planners can determine the need for various required services. The history of deinstitutionalization has shown that one of the most difficult such determinations involves the number of needed psychiatric beds for various localities. Historically, such assessments have been made on the basis of waiting and vacancy lists, expert estimates, or social indicator approaches that do not take into account local conditions. Specifically, this study aims to generate benchmarks or estimated rates of needed psychiatric beds for the 50 U.S. states by employing a predictive analytics methodology that uses nonlinear regression. Data used were secured primarily from the U.S. Census’ American Community Survey and from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration. Key predictors used were indicators of community mental health (CMH) service coverage, mental health disability in the adult population, longevity from birth, and the percentage of the 15+ who were married in 2018. The model was then used to calculate predicted bed rates based on the ‘what-if’ assumption of an optimal level of CMH service availability. The final model revealed an overall rate of needed beds of 34.9 per 100,000 population, or between 28.1 and 41.7. In total, 32% of the states provide inpatient psychiatric care at a level less than the estimated need; 28% at a level in excess of the need; with the remainder at a level within 95% confidence limits of the estimated need. These projections are in the low range of prior estimates, ranging from 33.8 to 64.1 since the 1980s. The study demonstrates the possibility of using predictive analytics to generate individualized estimates for a variety of service modalities for a range of localities.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher G. Hudson, 2021. "Benchmarks for Needed Psychiatric Beds for the United States: A Test of a Predictive Analytics Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-16, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:22:p:12205-:d:683988
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/22/12205/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/22/12205/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McDonagh, Marian S. & Smith, David H. & Goddard, Maria, 2000. "Measuring appropriate use of acute beds: A systematic review of methods and results," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 157-184, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rodney P. Jones, 2023. "Addressing the Knowledge Deficit in Hospital Bed Planning and Defining an Optimum Region for the Number of Different Types of Hospital Beds in an Effective Health Care System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(24), pages 1-36, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moura, Ana, 2022. "Do subsidized nursing homes and home care teams reduce hospital bed-blocking? Evidence from Portugal," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    2. Fusco, Marco & Buja, Alessandra & Piergentili, Paolo & Golfetto, Maria Teresa & Serafin, Gianni & Gallo, Silvia & Dalla Barba, Livio & Baldo, Vincenzo, 2016. "Individual and hospital-related determinants of potentially inappropriate admissions emerging from administrative records," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(11), pages 1304-1312.
    3. Zenga, Mariangela & Mazzoleni, Marcella & Mariani, Paolo & Marletta, Andrea, 2021. "The risk of inappropriateness: An analysis of the hospitalisations in the Italian geriatric wards," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    4. Gansel, Yannis & Danet, François & Rauscher, Catherine, 2010. "Long-stay inpatients in short-term emergency units in France: A case study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(4), pages 501-508, February.
    5. Ivo Casagranda Ivo & Giorgio Costantino & Greta Falavigna & Raffaello Furlan & Roberto Ippoliti, 2014. "Artificial Neural Networks and risk stratification in Emergency department," CERIS Working Paper 201412, CNR-IRCrES Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth - Torino (TO) ITALY - former Institute for Economic Research on Firms and Growth - Moncalieri (TO) ITALY.
    6. Zhou, Xu Dong & Li, Lu & Hesketh, Therese, 2014. "Health system reform in rural China: Voices of healthworkers and service-users," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 134-141.
    7. Bryan, Karen & Gage, Heather & Gilbert, Ken, 2006. "Delayed transfers of older people from hospital: Causes and policy implications," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 194-201, April.
    8. Yan Zhang & Liang Zhang & Haomiao Li & Yingchun Chen, 2018. "Determinants of Inappropriate Admissions in County Hospitals in Rural China: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-10, May.
    9. Moura, Ana, 2021. "Essays in health economics," Other publications TiSEM c93abd22-fa4a-42a5-b172-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. Casagranda, Ivo & Costantino, Giorgio & Falavigna, Greta & Furlan, Raffaello & Ippoliti, Roberto, 2016. "Artificial Neural Networks and risk stratification models in Emergency Departments: The policy maker's perspective," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 111-119.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:22:p:12205-:d:683988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.