IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i22p12066-d681103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consistency Is Key When Setting a New World Record for Running 10 Marathons in 10 Days

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolas Berger

    (School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Borough Road, Middlesbrough TS1 3BA, UK)

  • Daniel Cooley

    (School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Borough Road, Middlesbrough TS1 3BA, UK)

  • Michael Graham

    (School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Borough Road, Middlesbrough TS1 3BA, UK)

  • Claire Harrison

    (Newcastle Nutrition Community Team, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle NE7 7AH, UK)

  • Georgia Campbell

    (School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Borough Road, Middlesbrough TS1 3BA, UK)

  • Russ Best

    (Centre for Sports Science & Human Performance, WINTEC, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand)

Abstract

Background: We describe the requirements and physiological changes when running 10 consecutive marathons in 10 days at the same consistent pace by a female ultra-endurance athlete. Methods: Sharon Gayter (SG) 54 yrs, 162.5 cm, 49.3 kg maximal oxygen uptake (VO 2 max) 53 mL/kg −1 /min −1 . SG completed 42.195 km on a treadmill every day for 10 days. We measured heart rate (HR), Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE), oxygen uptake (VO 2 ), weight, body composition, blood parameters, nutrition, and hydration. Results: SG broke the previous record by ~2.5 h, with a cumulative completion time of 43 h 51 min 39 s. Over the 10 days, weight decreased from 51 kg to 48.4 kg, bodyfat mass from 9.1 kg to 7.2 kg (17.9% to 14.8%), and muscle mass from 23.2 kg to 22.8 kg. For all marathons combined, exercise intensity was ~60% VO 2 max; VO 2 1.6 ± 0.1 L.min −1 /32.3 ± 1.1 mL.kg −1 .min −1 , RER 0.8 ± 0, HR 143 ± 4 b.min −1 . Energy expenditure (EE) was 2030 ± 82 kcal/marathon, total EE for 10 days (including BMR) was 33,056 kcal, daily energy intake (EI) 2036 ± 418 kcal (20,356 kcal total), resulting an energy deficit (ED) of 12,700 kcal. Discussion: Performance and pacing were highly consistent across all 10 marathons without any substantial physiological decrements. Although overall EI did not match EE, leading to a significant ED, resulting in a 2.6 kg weight loss and decreases in bodyfat and skeletal muscle mass, this did not affect performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolas Berger & Daniel Cooley & Michael Graham & Claire Harrison & Georgia Campbell & Russ Best, 2021. "Consistency Is Key When Setting a New World Record for Running 10 Marathons in 10 Days," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-16, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:22:p:12066-:d:681103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/22/12066/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/22/12066/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicolas Berger & Daniel Cooley & Michael Graham & Claire Harrison & Russ Best, 2020. "Physiological Responses and Nutritional Intake during a 7-Day Treadmill Running World Record," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-17, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Suter & Caio Victor Sousa & Lee Hill & Volker Scheer & Pantelis Theo Nikolaidis & Beat Knechtle, 2020. "Even Pacing Is Associated with Faster Finishing Times in Ultramarathon Distance Trail Running—The “Ultra-Trail du Mont Blanc” 2008–2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-11, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:22:p:12066-:d:681103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.