IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i22p11764-d675521.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantification of the Ecological Value of Railroad Development Areas Using Logistic Regression Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Min-Kyeong Kim

    (Railroad Test & Certification Division, Korea Railroad Research Institute, Uiwang 16105, Korea)

  • Duckshin Park

    (Transportation Environmental Research Department, Korea Railroad Research Institute, Uiwang 16105, Korea)

  • Dong Yeob Kim

    (School of Civil, Architectural Engineering & Landscape Architecture, Sungkyunkwan University, Seobo-ro, Suwon 2066, Korea)

Abstract

According to the national railway network construction plan, Investment in railways has increased due to the need for environmentally friendly transportation, and the rail network is expanding throughout South Korea. Railway projects should be evaluated using strategic environmental impact assessments. In the “Guidelines for the Construction of Environment-friendly Railways”, seven priority headings that must be considered for railway projects are described. This guide notes that qualitative evaluation must be conducted during the survey process to reasonably predict impacts on the environment. However, quantitative evaluation with specific indicator values may also be necessary. In this study, independence analysis and logistic regression analysis were used to quantitatively evaluate railway environmental and ecological indicators. The results were used to develop a regression model reflecting seven indicators; biodiversity class, ecosystem type, vegetation conservation class, tree age class, ecological naturalness, presence of river ecosystems, and fragmented patch size. The fitness regression model showed 90.3% classification accuracy and the receiver operating curve (ROC) model fit was 88.6%. An environmental quality assessment map was prepared by classifying areas of environmental quality according to five grades. This is the first model for environmental and ecological evaluation of railway projects. Evaluation using the map showed that the railroad passes through areas with lower protection values compared to the results obtained using the national environmental evaluation map. Kappa analysis showed a low level of agreement between the two maps (kappa coefficient = 0.212). The results of this study can be applied to railway development project sites and may help to identify the best sites for the development of an environmentally friendly railway system.

Suggested Citation

  • Min-Kyeong Kim & Duckshin Park & Dong Yeob Kim, 2021. "Quantification of the Ecological Value of Railroad Development Areas Using Logistic Regression Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-12, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:22:p:11764-:d:675521
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/22/11764/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/22/11764/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mariusz Korzeń & Maciej Kruszyna, 2023. "Modified Ant Colony Optimization as a Means for Evaluating the Variants of the City Railway Underground Section," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Balgyn Ashimova & Raikhan Beisenova & Ignacio Menéndez-Pidal & Serik Jumabayev & Aktoty Zhupysheva & Rumiya Tazitdinova, 2023. "Environmental Hazards of the Railway Infrastructure of Kazakhstan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:22:p:11764-:d:675521. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.