IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i21p11627-d672791.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to Make the Hospital an Option Again: Midwives’ and Obstetricians’ Experiences with a Designated Clinic for Women Who Request Different Care than Recommended in the Guidelines

Author

Listed:
  • Floor Opdam

    (Department of Midwifery, The University of Midwifery Education & Studies, Universiteitssingel 60, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands)

  • Jeroen van Dillen

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amalia Children’s Hospital, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands)

  • Marieke de Vries

    (Institute for Computing and Information Sciences, Radboud University, Toernooiveld 212, 6525 EC Nijmegen, The Netherlands)

  • Martine Hollander

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amalia Children’s Hospital, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Background: An increasing number of maternity care providers encounter pregnant women who request less care than recommended. A designated outpatient clinic for women who request less care than recommended was set up in Nijmegen, the Netherlands. The clinic’s aim is to ensure that women make well-informed choices and arrive at a care plan that is acceptable to all parties. The aim of this study is to make the clinic’s approach explicit by examining care providers’ experiences who work with or within the clinic. Methods: qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews with Dutch midwives ( n = 6) and obstetricians ( n = 4) on their experiences with the outpatient clinic “Maternity Care Outside the Guidelines” in Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Results: Four main themes were identified: (1) ”Trusting mothers, childbirth and colleagues”; (2) “A supportive communication style”; (3) “Continuity of carer”; (4) “Willingness to reconsider responsibility and risk”. One overarching theme emerged from the data, which was “Guaranteeing women’s autonomy”. Mutual trust is a prerequisite for a constructive dialogue about birth plans and can be built and maintained more easily when there is continuity of carer during pregnancy and birth. Discussing birth plans at the clinic was believed to be successful because the care providers listen to women, take them seriously, show empathy and respect their right to refuse care. A change in vision on responsibility and risk is needed to overcome barriers such as providers’ fear of adverse outcomes. Taking a more flexible approach towards care outside the guidelines demands courage but is necessary to guarantee women’s autonomy. Key conclusions and implications for practice: In order to fulfil women’s needs and to prevent negative choices, care providers should care for women with trust, respect for autonomy, and provide freedom of choice and continuity. Care providers should reflect on and discuss why they are reluctant to support women’s wishes that go against their personal values. The structured approach used at this clinic could be helpful to maternity care providers in other contexts, to make them feel less vulnerable when working outside the guidelines.

Suggested Citation

  • Floor Opdam & Jeroen van Dillen & Marieke de Vries & Martine Hollander, 2021. "How to Make the Hospital an Option Again: Midwives’ and Obstetricians’ Experiences with a Designated Clinic for Women Who Request Different Care than Recommended in the Guidelines," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-16, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11627-:d:672791
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11627/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11627/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marieke de Vries & Danique Oostdijk & Kim G. T. Janssen & Raymond de Vries & José Sanders, 2022. "Negotiating Awareness: Dutch Midwives’ Experiences of Noninvasive Prenatal Screening Counseling," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Girma A. Wami & Viktória Prémusz & György M. Csákány & Kovács Kálmán & Viola Vértes & Péter Tamás, 2022. "Characteristics of Homebirth in Hungary: A Retrospective Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-12, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11627-:d:672791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.