IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i21p11149-d663315.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When Does a Lot Become Too Much? A Q Methodological Investigation of UK Student Perceptions of Digital Addiction

Author

Listed:
  • Luke Turner

    (Leeds University Business School, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)

  • Bridgette M. Bewick

    (Leeds Institute for Teaching Excellence, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
    School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)

  • Sarah Kent

    (Division of Psychological and Social Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)

  • Azaria Khyabani

    (Division of Psychological and Social Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)

  • Louise Bryant

    (School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)

  • Barbara Summers

    (Centre for Decision Research, Leeds University Business School, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)

Abstract

Despite the benefits of the internet and other digital technology, the online world has been associated with a negative impact on university student wellbeing. Many university students report symptoms of pathological internet use. Internationally, further research is needed to understand what student users of technology perceive to be problematic internet and/or digital use. The current study explores the range of perceptions that university students hold about ‘digital addiction’. We recruited 33 participants from a UK university into a Q-methodology study. Participants sorted, ranked, and commented on fifty-two statements representing the concourse of ‘things written or said about digital addiction’. The statements were identified from a comprehensive search of a wide variety of sources (e.g., newspapers, academic articles, blogs, and YouTube). Principal Component Analysis was used to identify four distinct viewpoints of ‘digital addiction’: (I) digital addiction is differentiated by the negative consequences experienced by addicted individuals; (II) digital addiction comes from our fascination with the online world; (III) digital addiction is an attempt to escape real world problems and impacts on mental health and relationships; (IV) digital addiction is defined by the amount of time we spend online. All four viewpoints share the perception that people do not realize they are digitally addicted because using and having digital devices on you at all times has become the social norm. There was also overall agreement that that those with ‘addictive personalities’ were more likely to be ‘digitally addicted’. Despite these similarities, complexity and contradictions within the viewpoints surrounding what digital addiction is and how it might be defined are apparent. The information found in this study provides important suggestions of how we might frame prevention and early intervention messages to engage students and ensure they develop the skills necessary to successfully manage their digital lives.

Suggested Citation

  • Luke Turner & Bridgette M. Bewick & Sarah Kent & Azaria Khyabani & Louise Bryant & Barbara Summers, 2021. "When Does a Lot Become Too Much? A Q Methodological Investigation of UK Student Perceptions of Digital Addiction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11149-:d:663315
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11149/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11149/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11149-:d:663315. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.