IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i20p10966-d659490.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inequalities in Mortality and Access to Hospital Care for Cervical Cancer—An Ecological Study

Author

Listed:
  • Luiz Vinicius de Alcantara Sousa

    (Laboratory of Epidemiology and Data Analysis, FMABC University Center, Santo André 09060-590, Brazil)

  • Erika da Silva Maciel

    (Graduate Program in Science and Health Education PPGECS_UFT, Federal University of Tocantins (UFT), Miracema do Tocantins 77650-000, Brazil)

  • Laércio da Silva Paiva

    (Laboratory of Epidemiology and Data Analysis, FMABC University Center, Santo André 09060-590, Brazil)

  • Stefanie de Sousa Antunes Alcantara

    (FMABC University Center, ABC Medical School, Santo André 09060-590, Brazil)

  • Vânia Barbosa do Nascimento

    (FMABC University Center, ABC Medical School, Santo André 09060-590, Brazil)

  • Fernando Luiz Affonso Fonseca

    (Clinical Analysis Laboratory, FMABC University Center, Santo André 09060-590, Brazil)

  • Fernando Adami

    (Laboratory of Epidemiology and Data Analysis, FMABC University Center, Santo André 09060-590, Brazil)

Abstract

Cervical cancer is the second most common form of cancer in the world among women, and it is estimated to be the third most frequent cancer in Brazil, as well as the fourth leading cause of death from cancer. There is a difference in cervical cancer mortality rates among different administrative regions in Brazil along with an inadequate distribution of cancer centers in certain Brazilian regions. Herein, we analyze the trends in hospital admission and mortality rates for CC between 2000 and 2012. This population-based ecological study evaluated the temporal trend in cervical cancer between the years 2000 and 2012, stratifying by Brazilian administrative regions. The North and Northeast regions had no reduction in mortality in all age groups studied (25 to 64 years); when analyzing hospitalization rates, only the age group of 50 to 64 years from the North Region did not present a reduction. During the years studied, in the South Region, the age group ranging from 50 to 54 years had the greatest reduction in mortality rates (β = −0.59, p = 0.001, r 2 = 0.63), and the group ranging from 45 to 49 years had the greatest reduction in hospital admission rates (β = −8.87, p = 0.025, r 2 = 0.37). Between the years 2000 and 2012, the greatest reduction in the incidence of UCC was in the South Region (β = −1.43, p = 0.236, r 2 = 0.12) followed by the Central-West (β = −1, p < 0.001, r 2 = 0.84), the Southeast (β = −0.95, p < 0.001, r 2 = 0.88), the Northeast (β = −0.67, p = 0.080, r 2 = 0.25), and, finally, by the North (β = −0.42, p = 0.157, r 2 = 0.17). There was a greater reduction in mortality rates and global hospitalization rates for CC in Brazil than in the United States during the same period with exceptions only in Brazil’s North and Northeast regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Luiz Vinicius de Alcantara Sousa & Erika da Silva Maciel & Laércio da Silva Paiva & Stefanie de Sousa Antunes Alcantara & Vânia Barbosa do Nascimento & Fernando Luiz Affonso Fonseca & Fernando Adami, 2021. "Inequalities in Mortality and Access to Hospital Care for Cervical Cancer—An Ecological Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-12, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:20:p:10966-:d:659490
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/20/10966/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/20/10966/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Allin, S. & Masseria, C. & Mossialos, E., 2009. "Measuring socioeconomic differences in use of health care services by wealth versus by income," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 99(10), pages 1849-1855.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pawinee Iamtrakul & Sararad Chayphong & Adrian Yat Wai Lo, 2022. "Exploring the Contribution of Social and Economic Status Factors (SES) to the Development of Learning Cities (LC)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Kjellsson, Gustav & Clarke, Philip & Gerdtham, Ulf-G., 2014. "Forgetting to remember or remembering to forget: A study of the recall period length in health care survey questions," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 34-46.
    3. Ricardo Rodrigues & Stefania Ilinca & Andrea E. Schmidt, 2018. "Income‐rich and wealth‐poor? The impact of measures of socio‐economic status in the analysis of the distribution of long‐term care use among older people," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 637-646, March.
    4. Silvana Miceli & Laura Maniscalco & Domenica Matranga, 2019. "Social networks and social activities promote cognitive functioning in both concurrent and prospective time: evidence from the SHARE survey," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 145-154, June.
    5. Sözmen, Kaan & Ünal, Belgin, 2016. "Explaining inequalities in Health Care Utilization among Turkish adults: Findings from Health Survey 2008," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 100-110.
    6. Alec Rhodes & Stephanie Moulton & Cäzilia Loibl & Donald Haurin & Joshua Joseph, 2024. "Mortgage Borrowing and Chronic Disease Outcomes in Older Age: Evidence From Biomarker Data in the Health and Retirement Study," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 79(7), pages 1849-1855.
    7. Janko Janković & Sladjana Šiljak & Miloš Erić & Jelena Marinković & Slavenka Janković, 2018. "Inequalities in the utilization of health care services in a transition European country: results from the national population health survey," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 63(2), pages 261-272, March.
    8. Šime Smolić & Ivan Čipin & Petra Međimurec, 2022. "Access to healthcare for people aged 50+ in Europe during the COVID-19 outbreak," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 793-809, December.
    9. Johannes G. Jaspersen, 2022. "When full insurance may not be optimal: The case of restricted substitution," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(6), pages 1249-1257, June.
    10. Sveréus, Sofia & Petzold, Max & Rehnberg, Clas, 2024. "Change in avoidable hospitalizations for low-income elders following quasi-market reform in primary care – Evidence from a natural experiment in Sweden," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 346(C).
    11. Domenica Matranga & Laura Maniscalco, 2022. "Inequality in Healthcare Utilization in Italy: How Important Are Barriers to Access?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-14, February.
    12. Giuliana Luca & Michela Ponzo & Antonio Andrés, 2013. "Health care utilization by immigrants in Italy," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-31, March.
    13. Vlastimil Chytrý & Milan Kubiatko & Romana Šindelářová & Janka Medová, 2022. "Socioeconomic Status of University Students as a Limiting Factor for Various Forms of Distance Education during COVID-19 Measures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-12, May.
    14. Pulok, Mohammad Habibullah & Hajizadeh, Mohammad, 2022. "Equity in the use of physician services in Canada's universal health system: A longitudinal analysis of older adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    15. Ricardo Rodrigues & Stefania Ilinca & Maša Filipovič Hrast & Andrej Srakar & Valentina Hlebec, 2022. "Care Task Division in Familialistic Care Regimes: A Comparative Analysis of Gender and Socio-Economic Inequalities in Austria and Slovenia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, August.
    16. Watanabe, Ryo & Hashimoto, Hideki, 2012. "Horizontal inequity in healthcare access under the universal coverage in Japan; 1986–2007," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(8), pages 1372-1378.
    17. Jasmine L Travers & Catherine C Cohen & Andrew W Dick & Patricia W Stone, 2017. "The Great American Recession and forgone healthcare: Do widened disparities between African-Americans and Whites remain?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-9, December.
    18. Giorgi Beridze & Alba Ayala & Oscar Ribeiro & Gloria Fernández-Mayoralas & Carmen Rodríguez-Blázquez & Vicente Rodríguez-Rodríguez & Fermina Rojo-Pérez & Maria João Forjaz & Amaia Calderón-Larrañaga, 2020. "Are Loneliness and Social Isolation Associated with Quality of Life in Older Adults? Insights from Northern and Southern Europe," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-14, November.
    19. Mohammad Habibullah Pulok & Kees Gool & Mohammad Hajizadeh & Sara Allin & Jane Hall, 2020. "Measuring horizontal inequity in healthcare utilisation: a review of methodological developments and debates," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(2), pages 171-180, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:20:p:10966-:d:659490. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.