IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i19p10493-d650702.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coping with Stress in Complicated Pregnancy and Gestational Weight Gain

Author

Listed:
  • Agnieszka Rolińska

    (Chair and Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland)

  • Anna Aftyka

    (Department of Anesthesiological and Intensive Care Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland)

  • Marzena Samardakiewicz

    (Chair and Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland)

Abstract

Maternal obesity is one of the leading health problems in the world. Excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) can lead to many complications during pregnancy, especially when it is accompanied by diabetes. Moreover, the risk of excessive GWG in pregnant women is significant, irrespective of prenatal counseling. Studies on this subject concerning coping with stress are lacking in the literature. The present work is aimed at evaluating the styles of coping with stress and their relation to GWG in pregnant women with gestational diabetes (GDM) for whom sudden adaptation to dietary management during this period can be challenging. It was indicated that women with GDM reported high stress related to potential maternal-fetal complications and worries about compliance with dietary management. The overall weight gain of participants in pregnancy was determined in connection to their prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) and classified based on the Institute of Medicine guidelines. A standardized psychological scale was used to assess coping styles. The results showed that almost half of the participants did not meet the Institute of Medicine recommendations for weight gain during pregnancy. There were significant correlations between the styles of coping with stress and the GWG. Additionally, low correlations were indicated between emotional, avoidant, task-oriented coping styles and the age of pregnant women with GDM. Regression analysis showed that the stress-coping style that focused on emotions was the most predictive of overall weight gain. There is a need for a better understanding of psychological barriers in achieving the recommended GWG and potential limitations in providers’ interventions, particularly for GDM.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnieszka Rolińska & Anna Aftyka & Marzena Samardakiewicz, 2021. "Coping with Stress in Complicated Pregnancy and Gestational Weight Gain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-11, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10493-:d:650702
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10493/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10493/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah D McDonald & Zhijie Michael Yu & Sherry van Blyderveen & Louis Schmidt & Wendy Sword & Meredith Vanstone & Anne Biringer & Helen McDonald & Joseph Beyene, 2020. "Prediction of excess pregnancy weight gain using psychological, physical, and social predictors: A validated model in a prospective cohort study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10493-:d:650702. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.