IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i19p10353-d648127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biological Risk in Italian Prisons: From the COVID-19 Management to the Development of a Standardized Model for Emergency Response

Author

Listed:
  • Cristiano Franchi

    (Central Laboratory for the National DNA Database, Prison Administration Department, Ministry of Justice, 00146 Rome, Italy)

  • Ezio Giacalone

    (Prison and Probation Police, Ministry of Justice, 00100 Rome, Italy)

  • Daniele Di Giovanni

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
    School of Medicine and Surgery, Unicamillus-Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences, 00131 Rome, Italy)

  • Stefania Moramarco

    (Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy)

  • Mariachiara Carestia

    (Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Within the confinements of critical infrastructures, the COVID-19 pandemic is posing a series of challenges to Health Management. In the spotlight of highly contagious and quick spreading diseases within such enclosed facilities, whether it be a detention facility or otherwise, the health and safety of those living within its internment is paramount. This paper aims to highlight the specific challenges and the possible solutions to counteract this problem, starting from the lessons learnt from the Italian prison system case study. Following the general description of the available resources within the Italian prisons, the study aimed at specifically describing the first counteracting measures deployed by the Italian prison authorities during the first phase of the COVID-19 outbreak (February–July 2020). The aim was to propose an integrated plan capable of responding to a biological threat within the prisons. In particular, the study describes the actions and technical features that, in accordance with national and international legal frameworks and the relevant organisational bodies that run the Italian Prison Service, had been adopted in managing, right from the start, the COVID-19 pandemic until Summer 2020. Available information and data showed the ability of the prison administration to comply almost completely with WHO’s technical and human rights recommendations and also, in successfully handling prison emergencies both in terms of the sick and the deceased in line with the epidemiological framework of the general population. In addition, the paper proposes a draft of guidelines that should involve the National Health Service and the Prison Service that are aimed at supporting the local prison facilities with drawing up their own biological incident contingency plans. An approved, legal, standardised plan could increase the awareness of prison managers. It could even increase their self-confidence, in particular, with regard to cases of dispute and their ability to respond to them. In fact, it is valuable and forward-thinking to be able to demonstrate that every endeavour has been taken and that ‘certified’ best practices have been put in place in accordance with the national standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristiano Franchi & Ezio Giacalone & Daniele Di Giovanni & Stefania Moramarco & Mariachiara Carestia, 2021. "Biological Risk in Italian Prisons: From the COVID-19 Management to the Development of a Standardized Model for Emergency Response," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10353-:d:648127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10353/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10353/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Flavia Riccardo & Jonathan E. Suk & Laura Espinosa & Antonino Bella & Cristina Giambi & Martina Del Manso & Christian Napoli & Maria Grazia Dente & Gloria Nacca & Silvia Declich, 2018. "Key Dimensions for the Prevention and Control of Communicable Diseases in Institutional Settings: A Scoping Review to Guide the Development of a Tool to Strengthen Preparedness at Migrant Holding Cent," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Federico Baldassi & Mariachiara Carestia & Stefania Moramarco & Andrea Malizia & Pasquale Gaudio, 2021. "Infectious Diseases Seeker (IDS): An Innovative Tool for Prompt Identification of Infectious Diseases during Outbreaks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-13, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Osnat Keidar & David S. Srivastava & Emmanouil Pikoulis & Aristomenis K. Exadaktylos, 2019. "Health of Refugees and Migrants—Where Do We Stand and What Directions Should We Take?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-8, April.
    2. Antonios Kolimenakis & Demetrios Tsesmelis & Clive Richardson & Georgios Balatsos & Panagiotis G. Milonas & Angeliki Stefopoulou & Olaf Horstick & Laith Yakob & Dimitrios P. Papachristos & Antonios Mi, 2022. "Knowledge, Attitudes and Perception of Mosquito Control in Different Citizenship Regimes within and Surrounding the Malakasa Open Accommodation Refugee Camp in Athens, Greece," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-13, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10353-:d:648127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.