Author
Listed:
- Zahra Mojtahedi
(Department of Healthcare Administration and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA)
- Ji Won Yoo
(Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nevada Las Vegas School of Medicine, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA)
- Karen Callahan
(Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA)
- Neeraj Bhandari
(Department of Healthcare Administration and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA)
- Donghui Lou
(The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao 066001, China)
- Katayoon Ghodsi
(Department of Healthcare Administration and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA)
- Jay J. Shen
(Department of Healthcare Administration and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA)
Abstract
Background—Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) is a rare, morbid, fatal cancer with distressing symptoms. Maintaining a high quality of life while reducing hospital charges and length of stay (LOS) for the end-of-life period remains a major challenge for the healthcare system. Palliative care utilization has been shown to address these challenges; moreover, its use has increased in recent years among cancer patients. However, the utilization of palliative care in rare cancers, such as ECC, has not yet been explored. Objectives—To investigate palliative care utilization among ECC patients admitted to US hospitals between 2007 and 2016 and its association with patient demographics, clinical characteristics, hospital charges, and LOS. Methods—De-identified patient data of each hospitalization were retrieved from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Codes V66.7 (ICD-9-CM) or Z51.5 (ICD-10-CM) were used to find palliative care utilization. Multivariate adjusted logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess factors associated with palliative care use, LOS, hospital charges, and in-hospital death. Results—Of 4426 hospitalizations, only 6.7% received palliative care services. Palliative care utilization did not significantly increase over time ( p = 0.06); it reduced hospital charges by USD 25,937 ( p < 0.0001) and LOS by 1.3 days ( p = 0.0004) per hospitalization. Palliative care was positively associated with female gender, severe disease, and age group ≥80 ( p ≤ 0.05). The average LOS was 8.5 days for each admission. Conclusions—Hospital admissions with palliative care utilization had lower hospital charges and LOS in ECC. However, ECC patients received less palliative care compared with more common cancers sharing similar symptoms (e.g., pancreatic cancer). ECC patients also had longer LOS compared with the national average. Further research is warranted to develop interventions to increase palliative care utilization among ECC hospital patients.
Suggested Citation
Zahra Mojtahedi & Ji Won Yoo & Karen Callahan & Neeraj Bhandari & Donghui Lou & Katayoon Ghodsi & Jay J. Shen, 2021.
"Inpatient Palliative Care Is Less Utilized in Rare, Fatal Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Ten-Year National Perspective,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-10, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10004-:d:641348
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Oscar Corli & Giacomo Pellegrini & Cristina Bosetti & Luca Riva & Matteo Crippa & Emanuele Amodio & Gianlorenzo Scaccabarozzi, 2020.
"Impact of Palliative Care in Evaluating and Relieving Symptoms in Patients with Advanced Cancer. Results from the DEMETRA Study,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-11, November.
- Jiaoli Cai & Li Zhang & Denise Guerriere & Hongli Fan & Peter C. Coyte, 2020.
"Where Do Cancer Patients in Receipt of Home-Based Palliative Care Prefer to Die and What Are the Determinants of a Preference for a Home Death?,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-11, December.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10004-:d:641348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.