IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i18p9900-d639522.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shot Distribution and Accuracy in Senior and Youth International Basketball Games: Changes over the Decade of the 2010s

Author

Listed:
  • Haruhiko Madarame

    (Department of Sports and Fitness, Shigakkan University, 55 Nakoyama, Yokonemachi, Obu 474-8651, Aichi, Japan)

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the changes in shot distribution and accuracy in senior and under-17 international basketball tournaments in the 2010s. A retrospective cross-sectional design was employed, and a total of 1055 games from 20 world-level tournaments held between 2010 and 2019 were analyzed. The tournaments held in 2010 were played under the old three-point line (6.25 m), and the rest of the tournaments were played under the new three-point line (6.75 m). The numbers of two- and three-point shot attempts in each game were normalized to 100 possessions. Differences in mean values of two- and three-point shot attempts were analyzed by a two-way (category × year) between-subjects analysis of variance (ANOVA). Differences in the success rates of two- and three-point shots were analyzed by Fisher’s exact test. There was no significant category × year interaction for two-point shot attempts. However, there were significant main effects of category and year for two-point shot attempts. The number of two-point shot attempts increased significantly in 2012 and, in 2016, returned to a level not significantly different from that in 2010, independent of categories. There was a significant category × year interaction for three-point shot attempts. The number of three-point shot attempts decreased significantly in 2012 and, by 2016, returned to a level not significantly different from that in 2010 in senior men and under-17 women. There was no significant change in the number of three-point shot attempts in under-17 men. The effect of the extension of the three-point line on shot accuracy was limited. Differences in shot accuracy were prominent between age categories: the accuracy was lower in under-17 games than in senior games for both sexes. Although under-17 men attempted fewer three-point shots than senior men, under-17 women attempted a similar number of or more three-point shots than senior women. These findings can contribute to a better understanding of age and sex differences in recent trends in international basketball.

Suggested Citation

  • Haruhiko Madarame, 2021. "Shot Distribution and Accuracy in Senior and Youth International Basketball Games: Changes over the Decade of the 2010s," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-9, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:18:p:9900-:d:639522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9900/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9900/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tomas Vencúrik & Damir Knjaz & Tomislav Rupčić & Goran Sporiš & Feng Li, 2021. "Kinematic Analysis of 2-Point and 3-Point Jump Shot of Elite Young Male and Female Basketball Players," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-13, January.
    2. Rui Dong & Bizhen Lian & Shaoliang Zhang & Mingxin Zhang & Sirius Z.Y. Huang & Peter O'Donoghue, 2021. "Addressing opposition quality in basketball performance evaluation," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 263-276, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cíntia França & Beatriz B. Gomes & Élvio Rúbio Gouveia & Andreas Ihle & Manuel J. Coelho-E-Silva, 2021. "The Jump Shot Performance in Youth Basketball: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-12, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:18:p:9900-:d:639522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.