IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i18p9799-d637787.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ladder Use in Older People: Type, Frequency, Tasks and Predictors of Risk Behaviours

Author

Listed:
  • Cameron Hicks

    (Falls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia)

  • Erika M. Pliner

    (Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA)

  • Stephen R. Lord

    (Falls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia)

  • Daina L. Sturnieks

    (Falls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
    School of Medical Sciences, UNSW, Sydney, NSW 1466, Australia)

Abstract

Ladder fall and injury risk increases with age. People who present to a hospital after an injurious ladder fall have been surveyed, but little is known about ladder use in the community. The purpose of this study was to: (1) document salient factors related to ladder safety, and (2) determine physical, executive function, psychological and frequency-of-use factors associated with unsafe ladder use in older people. One hundred and two older people (aged 65+ years) were recruited. Participants completed questionnaires on demographics, health, and ladder use (type, frequency, task, behaviours) and underwent assessments of physical and executive function ability. Results showed both older men and women commonly use step ladders (61% monthly, 96% yearly), mostly inside the home for tasks such as changing a lightbulb (70%) and decorating (43%). Older men also commonly use straight ladders (27% monthly, 75% yearly), mostly outside the home for tasks such as clearing gutters (74%) and pruning trees (40%). Unsafe ladder use was more common in males and individuals with greater ladder use frequency, greater quadriceps strength, better upper limb dexterity, better balance, better stepping ability, greater self-reported everyday risk-taking, a lower fear of falling, and fewer health problems compared to their counterparts (all p < 0.05). These findings document ladder use by older people and provide insight into unsafe ladder behaviours that may be amenable to interventions to reduce ladder falls and associated injuries.

Suggested Citation

  • Cameron Hicks & Erika M. Pliner & Stephen R. Lord & Daina L. Sturnieks, 2021. "Ladder Use in Older People: Type, Frequency, Tasks and Predictors of Risk Behaviours," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-10, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:18:p:9799-:d:637787
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9799/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9799/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sang Chul Kim & Young Sun Ro & Sang Do Shin & Joo Yeong Kim, 2016. "Preventive Effects of Safety Helmets on Traumatic Brain Injury after Work-Related Falls," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Ting-Min Hsieh & Ching-Hua Tsai & Hang-Tsung Liu & Chun-Ying Huang & Sheng-En Chou & Wei-Ti Su & Shiun-Yuan Hsu & Ching-Hua Hsieh, 2020. "Effect of Height of Fall on Mortality in Patients with Fall Accidents: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-16, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jibiao Zhou & Tao Zheng & Sheng Dong & Xinhua Mao & Changxi Ma, 2022. "Impact of Helmet-Wearing Policy on E-Bike Safety Riding Behavior: A Bivariate Ordered Probit Analysis in Ningbo, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Jie Li & Floris Goerlandt & Kai Way Li, 2019. "Slip and Fall Incidents at Work: A Visual Analytics Analysis of the Research Domain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-18, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:18:p:9799-:d:637787. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.