IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i18p9615-d634006.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Academic Promotion of Physicians in Medical Schools: A Special Focus on Primary Health Care in Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Hsin Ma

    (Department of Family Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112, Taiwan)

  • Feng-Yuan Chu

    (Division of Clinical Toxicology and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112, Taiwan
    School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan)

  • Tzeng-Ji Chen

    (Department of Family Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112, Taiwan
    School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan
    Big Data Center, Department of Medical Research, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112, Taiwan)

  • Shinn-Jang Hwang

    (Department of Family Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112, Taiwan
    School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan)

Abstract

The quality and quantity of papers published in journals play a crucial role in achieving an academic promotion in medical schools. Reports on the criteria for promotion and their impact on different specialties, especially on primary health care, which has low research output, are rare. We investigated the scoring systems generally adopted for academic promotion at most medical schools in Taiwan. The weighted scores were derived from the multiplication of weights from categories of paper, journal impact factor, or ranking in a certain category by impact factor, and author order. To determine the thresholds of papers required for different levels of promotion, we took papers in the highest- or lowest-ranked journals in the primary health care category in 2019 Journal Citation Reports as examples. Considering publications in the highest-ranked journals, a median of 4.6 first or corresponding author papers were required for a professorship, as well as 3.3 for an associate professorship, and 2.5 for an assistant professorship. In contrast, a median of 30, 20, and 13.5 papers in the lowest-ranked journals was required for the corresponding positions. Thus, academic promotions for primary health care educators in Taiwan are highly demanding. The detrimental effects of scoring systems deserve further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Hsin Ma & Feng-Yuan Chu & Tzeng-Ji Chen & Shinn-Jang Hwang, 2021. "Academic Promotion of Physicians in Medical Schools: A Special Focus on Primary Health Care in Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-13, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:18:p:9615-:d:634006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9615/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9615/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meredith T Niles & Lesley A Schimanski & Erin C McKiernan & Juan Pablo Alperin, 2020. "Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Ming-Hsien Lin & Liang-Kung Chen, 2006. "The impact of impact factor on small specialties: A case study of family medicine in Taiwan," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 66(3), pages 513-520, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Orhan, Mehmet A. & van Rossenberg, Yvonne & Bal, P. Matthijs, 2024. "Authorship inequality and elite dominance in management and organizational research: A review of six decades," OSF Preprints tzx92, Center for Open Science.
    2. Jing Li & Qiushuang Long & Xiaoli Lu & Dengsheng Wu, 2023. "Citation beneficiaries of discipline-specific mega-journals: who and how much," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Jun Zhang & Xiaoyan Su & Yifei Wang, 2024. "A Qualitative Study on the Relationship between Faculty Mobility and Scientific Impact: Toward the Sustainable Development of Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Najko Jahn & Lisa Matthias & Mikael Laakso, 2022. "Toward transparency of hybrid open access through publisher‐provided metadata: An article‐level study of Elsevier," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(1), pages 104-118, January.
    5. Hendrik P. Dalen, 2021. "How the publish-or-perish principle divides a science: the case of economists," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1675-1694, February.
    6. van Dalen, Hendrik Peter, 2020. "How the Publish-or-Perish Principle Divides a Science : The Case of Academic Economists," Other publications TiSEM 6fbb6b92-0e06-4271-b6e7-3, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. van Dalen, Hendrik Peter, 2021. "How the publish-or-perish principle divides a science: The case of economists," Other publications TiSEM a6a5a855-bb5a-4d52-a841-3, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Tony Ross-Hellauer & Thomas Klebel & Petr Knoth & Nancy Pontika, 2024. "Value dissonance in research(er) assessment: individual and perceived institutional priorities in review, promotion, and tenure," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 51(3), pages 337-351.
    9. Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva & Daniel J. Dunleavy & Mina Moradzadeh & Joshua Eykens, 2021. "A credit-like rating system to determine the legitimacy of scientific journals and publishers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(10), pages 8589-8616, October.
    10. Nicky Agate & Rebecca Kennison & Stacy Konkiel & Christopher P. Long & Jason Rhody & Simone Sacchi & Penelope Weber, 2020. "The transformative power of values-enacted scholarship," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-12, December.
    11. Buggenhagen, Magnus & Blind, Knut, 2022. "Development of 5G – Identifying organizations active in publishing, patenting, and standardization," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(4).
    12. Chia-Hsiang Chen & Kuo-Wei Yen, 2023. "Developing International Collaboration Indicators in Fisheries Remote Sensing Research to Achieve SDG 14 and 17," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.
    13. Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, 2021. "The Matthew effect impacts science and academic publishing by preferentially amplifying citations, metrics and status," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(6), pages 5373-5377, June.
    14. Kickul, Jill & Griffiths, Mark & Brännback, Malin & Robb, Colleen C., 2023. "Don't always judge an article by its cover: An examination of proxies for journal impact and citations in entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 20(C).
    15. Mikael Laakso & Lisa Matthias & Najko Jahn, 2021. "Open is not forever: A study of vanished open access journals," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(9), pages 1099-1112, September.
    16. Shannon Mason & Lenandlar Singh, 2022. "When a journal is both at the ‘top’ and the ‘bottom’: the illogicality of conflating citation-based metrics with quality," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(6), pages 3683-3694, June.
    17. Jeremiah Joven Joaquin & Raymond R. Tan & Hazel T. Biana, 2023. "So, what if a journal is both at the ‘top’ and ‘bottom’: reply to Mason and Singh," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(10), pages 5859-5863, October.
    18. Diane (DeDe) Dawson & Esteban Morales & Erin C McKiernan & Lesley A Schimanski & Meredith T Niles & Juan Pablo Alperin, 2022. "The role of collegiality in academic review, promotion, and tenure," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-17, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:18:p:9615-:d:634006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.