IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i17p9224-d627036.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Associated with the Maintenance of Breastfeeding at One Year among Women in Chiang Mai, Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Krongporn Ongprasert

    (Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

  • Penprapa Siviroj

    (Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate factors associated with breastfeeding for at least one year among women in Chiang Mai, Thailand. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 451 mothers with children aged between 12 and 24 months who visited the well-baby clinic among women who visited the well-baby clinic in secondary and tertiary hospitals. The data collected included maternal sociodemographic information, employment status, reasons contributing to continued breastfeeding, primary sources of information, and influential people affecting continued breastfeeding. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the relationship between explanatory variables and continued breastfeeding at one year. Reporting “easier to bond with baby” as a reason to continue breastfeeding (AOR 3.118, 95% CI: 2.022, 4.809) and multiparous status (AOR 1.588, 95% CI: 1.042, 2.420) were positive predictors of mothers who had breastfeeding at least one year postpartum while mothers with undergraduate education level (AOR 0.635, 95% CI: 0.404, 0.997) were more likely to discontinue breastfeeding. Our study highlighted that working mothers have lower odds of continued breastfeeding than stay-at-home mothers (SAHMs), which was found for work with day shifts (AOR 0.437, 95% CI: 0.261, 0.731), work with rotational shifts (AOR 0.481, 95% CI: 0.247, 0.934), and work from home jobs with a flexible schedule (AOR 0.439, 95% CI: 0.229, 0.838). These findings showed that both employment outside home and work from home were strong risk factors for discontinuing breastfeeding before 12 months. We suggest that a breastfeeding-friendly workplace policy is essential to enhance the continuance of breastfeeding. Additionally, working at home requires more research to explore breastfeeding barriers and establish more support strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Krongporn Ongprasert & Penprapa Siviroj, 2021. "Factors Associated with the Maintenance of Breastfeeding at One Year among Women in Chiang Mai, Thailand," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-12, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:17:p:9224-:d:627036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/17/9224/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/17/9224/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ritesh Chimoriya & Jane Anne Scott & James Rufus John & Sameer Bhole & Andrew Hayen & Gregory S. Kolt & Amit Arora, 2020. "Determinants of Full Breastfeeding at 6 Months and Any Breastfeeding at 12 and 24 Months among Women in Sydney: Findings from the HSHK Birth Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Sarah Bell & Sarah Siau Yi Yew & Gemma Devenish & Diep Ha & Loc Do & Jane Scott, 2018. "Duration of Breastfeeding, but Not Timing of Solid Food, Reduces the Risk of Overweight and Obesity in Children Aged 24 to 36 Months: Findings from an Australian Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Jane Scott & Ellen Ahwong & Gemma Devenish & Diep Ha & Loc Do, 2019. "Determinants of Continued Breastfeeding at 12 and 24 Months: Results of an Australian Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-13, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Monika A. Zielinska & Petra Rust & Daria Masztalerz-Kozubek & Jacqueline Bichler & Jadwiga Hamułka, 2019. "Factors Influencing the Age of Complementary Feeding—A Cross-Sectional Study from Two European Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Ritesh Chimoriya & Jane Anne Scott & James Rufus John & Sameer Bhole & Andrew Hayen & Gregory S. Kolt & Amit Arora, 2020. "Determinants of Full Breastfeeding at 6 Months and Any Breastfeeding at 12 and 24 Months among Women in Sydney: Findings from the HSHK Birth Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Jane Scott & Ellen Ahwong & Gemma Devenish & Diep Ha & Loc Do, 2019. "Determinants of Continued Breastfeeding at 12 and 24 Months: Results of an Australian Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-13, October.
    4. Amira Hassan & Gemma Devenish & Rebecca K. Golley & Diep Ha & Loc G. Do & Jane A. Scott, 2020. "Sources and Determinants of Wholegrain Intake in a Cohort of Australian Children Aged 12–14 Months," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Amit Arora & Dimitri Lucas & Michael To & Ritesh Chimoriya & Sameer Bhole & Santosh Kumar Tadakamadla & James J. Crall, 2021. "How Do Mothers Living in Socially Deprived Communities Perceive Oral Health of Young Children? A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-18, March.
    6. Frédéric Dutheil & Grégory Méchin & Philippe Vorilhon & Amanda C. Benson & Anne Bottet & Maëlys Clinchamps & Chloé Barasinski & Valentin Navel, 2021. "Breastfeeding after Returning to Work: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-21, August.
    7. Li-Tung Huang, 2020. "Maternal and Early-Life Nutrition and Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-4, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:17:p:9224-:d:627036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.