Author
Listed:
- Cristina Lasmarías
(Department of Education and Training, Catalan Institute of Oncology, 08908 Barcelona, Spain
Catalonia Chronic Care Research Group, University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia, 08500 Vic, Spain)
- Amor Aradilla-Herrero
(School of Nursing, Escoles Universitàries Gimbernat (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona), 08174 Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain)
- Cristina Esquinas
(Department of Pneumology, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, 08031 Barcelona, Spain
Public Health, Mental, Maternal and Child Health Nursing Departament, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, 08031 Barcelona, Spain)
- Sebastià Santaeugènia
(Catalonia Chronic Care Research Group, University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia, 08500 Vic, Spain
Chronic Care Program, Health Department, Generalitat de Catalunya, 08028 Barcelona, Spain)
- Francisco Cegri
(Responsible for Strategy and Innovation of the Association of Family and Community Nursing of Catalonia (AIFiCC), 08001 Barcelona, Spain
Primary Care Centre Sant Martí de Provençals, Institut Català de la Salut, 08001 Barcelona, Spain)
- Esther Limón
(Permanent Board of the Catalan Society of Family and Community Medicine (CAMFiC), 08019 Barcelona, Spain
Primary Care Centre Mataró-7, Institut Català de la Salut, 08019 Mataró, Spain)
- Mireia Subirana-Casacuberta
(Nursing Department, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Institut d’Investigació i Innovació Parc TaulíI3PT, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Consorci Sanitari Parc Taulí, 08208 Sabadell, Spain
Research Group on Methodology, Methods, Models, and Health and Social Outcomes, Faculty of Health Science and Welfare, Centre for Health and Social Care Research, University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia, 08500 Vic, Spain)
Abstract
Primary care (PC) professionals have been considered the most appropriate practitioners for leading Advance care planning (ACP) processes with advanced chronic patients. Aim: To explore how PC doctors’ and nurses’ self-efficacy surrounding ACP is linked to their sociodemographic characteristics, background and perceptions of ACP practices. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed. Sociodemographics, background and perceptions about ACP in practice were collected using an online survey. The Advance Care Planning Self-Efficacy Spanish (ACP-SEs) scale was used for the self-efficacy measurement. Statistical analysis: Bivariate, multivariate and backward stepwise logistic regression analyses were performed to identify variables independently related to a higher score on the ACP-SEs. Results: N = 465 participants, 70.04% doctors, 81.47% female. The participants had a mean age of 46.45 years and 66.16% had spent >15 years in their current practice. The logistic regression model showed that scoring ≤ 75 on the ACP-SEs was related to a higher score on feeling sufficiently trained, having participated in ACP processes, perceiving that ACP facilitates knowledge of preferences and values, and perceiving that ACP improves patients’ quality of life. Conclusion: Professionals with previous background and those who have a positive perception of ACP are more likely to feel able to carry out ACP processes with patients.
Suggested Citation
Cristina Lasmarías & Amor Aradilla-Herrero & Cristina Esquinas & Sebastià Santaeugènia & Francisco Cegri & Esther Limón & Mireia Subirana-Casacuberta, 2021.
"Primary Care Professionals’ Self-Efficacy Surrounding Advance Care Planning and Its Link to Sociodemographics, Background and Perceptions: A Cross-Sectional Study,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-13, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:17:p:9034-:d:623147
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:17:p:9034-:d:623147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.