IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i17p8941-d621510.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Patient Safety Incidents in Primary Care Reported in an Electronic Registry Application

Author

Listed:
  • Montserrat Gens-Barberà

    (Quality and Patient Safety Central Functional Unit, Gerència d’Atenció Primària Camp de Tarragona, Institut Català de la Salut, 43005 Tarragona, Spain)

  • Núria Hernández-Vidal

    (Quality and Patient Safety Central Functional Unit, Gerència d’Atenció Primària Camp de Tarragona, Institut Català de la Salut, 43005 Tarragona, Spain)

  • Elisa Vidal-Esteve

    (Quality and Patient Safety Central Functional Unit, Gerència d’Atenció Primària Camp de Tarragona, Institut Català de la Salut, 43005 Tarragona, Spain)

  • Yolanda Mengíbar-García

    (Quality and Patient Safety Central Functional Unit, Gerència d’Atenció Primària Camp de Tarragona, Institut Català de la Salut, 43005 Tarragona, Spain)

  • Immaculada Hospital-Guardiola

    (Quality and Patient Safety Central Functional Unit, Gerència d’Atenció Primària Camp de Tarragona, Institut Català de la Salut, 43005 Tarragona, Spain
    Primary Health-Care Centre, Institut Català de la Salut, 43005 Tarragona, Spain)

  • Eva M. Oya-Girona

    (Quality and Patient Safety Central Functional Unit, Gerència d’Atenció Primària Camp de Tarragona, Institut Català de la Salut, 43005 Tarragona, Spain
    Primary Health-Care Centre, Institut Català de la Salut, 43005 Tarragona, Spain)

  • Ferran Bejarano-Romero

    (Quality and Patient Safety Central Functional Unit, Gerència d’Atenció Primària Camp de Tarragona, Institut Català de la Salut, 43005 Tarragona, Spain
    Pharmacy Unit, Gerència d’Atenció Primària Camp de Tarragona, Institut Català de la Salut, 43005 Tarragona, Spain)

  • Carles Castro-Muniain

    (Quality and Patient Safety Central Functional Unit, Gerència d’Atenció Primària Camp de Tarragona, Institut Català de la Salut, 43005 Tarragona, Spain)

  • Eva M. Satué-Gracia

    (Research Support Unit Tarragona-Reus, Institut Universitari D’investigació en L’atenció Primària Jordi Gol, (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Institut Català de la Salut, 43202 Reus, Spain)

  • Cristina Rey-Reñones

    (Research Support Unit Tarragona-Reus, Institut Universitari D’investigació en L’atenció Primària Jordi Gol, (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Institut Català de la Salut, 43202 Reus, Spain
    Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43201 Reus, Spain)

  • Francisco M. Martín-Luján

    (Research Support Unit Tarragona-Reus, Institut Universitari D’investigació en L’atenció Primària Jordi Gol, (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Institut Català de la Salut, 43202 Reus, Spain
    Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43201 Reus, Spain
    Senior supervisory author.)

Abstract

Objectives: (1) To describe the epidemiology of patient safety (PS) incidents registered in an electronic notification system in primary care (PC) health centres; (2) to define a risk map; and (3) to identify the critical areas where intervention is needed. Design: Descriptive analytical study of incidents reported from 1 January to 31 December 2018, on the TPSC Cloud™ platform (The Patient Safety Company) accessible from the corporate website (Intranet) of the regional public health service. Setting: 24 Catalan Institute of Health PC health centres of the Tarragona region (Spain). Participants: Professionals from the PC health centres and a Patient Safety Functional Unit. Measurements: Data obtained from records voluntarily submitted to an electronic, standardised and anonymised form. Data recorded: healthcare unit, notifier, type of incident, risk matrix, causal and contributing factors, preventability, level of resolution and improvement actions. Results: A total of 1544 reports were reviewed and 1129 PS incidents were analysed: 25.0% of incidents did not reach the patient; 66.5% reached the patient without causing harm, and 8.5% caused adverse events. Nurses provided half of the reports (48.5%), while doctors reported more adverse events (70.8%; p < 0.01). Of the 96 adverse events, 46.9% only required observation, 34.4% caused temporary damage that required treatment, 13.5% required (or prolonged) hospitalization, and 5.2% caused severe permanent damage and/or a situation close to death. Notably, 99.2% were considered preventable. The main critical areas were: communication (27.8%), clinical-administrative management (25.1%), care delivery (23.5%) and medicines (18.4%); few incidents were related to diagnosis (3.6%). Conclusions: PS incident notification applications are adequate for reporting incidents and adverse events associated with healthcare. Approximately 75% and 10% of incidents reach the patient and cause some damage, respectively, and most cases are considered preventable. Adequate and strengthened risk management of critical areas is required to improve PS.

Suggested Citation

  • Montserrat Gens-Barberà & Núria Hernández-Vidal & Elisa Vidal-Esteve & Yolanda Mengíbar-García & Immaculada Hospital-Guardiola & Eva M. Oya-Girona & Ferran Bejarano-Romero & Carles Castro-Muniain & Ev, 2021. "Analysis of Patient Safety Incidents in Primary Care Reported in an Electronic Registry Application," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-21, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:17:p:8941-:d:621510
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/17/8941/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/17/8941/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kathrin M Cresswell & Sukhmeet S Panesar & Sarah A Salvilla & Andrew Carson-Stevens & Itziar Larizgoitia & Liam J Donaldson & David Bates & Aziz Sheikh & on behalf of the World Health Organization's (, 2013. "Global Research Priorities to Better Understand the Burden of Iatrogenic Harm in Primary Care: An International Delphi Exercise," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-6, November.
    2. Ann-Marie Howell & Elaine M Burns & George Bouras & Liam J Donaldson & Thanos Athanasiou & Ara Darzi, 2015. "Can Patient Safety Incident Reports Be Used to Compare Hospital Safety? Results from a Quantitative Analysis of the English National Reporting and Learning System Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Davide Ferorelli & Biagio Solarino & Silvia Trotta & Gabriele Mandarelli & Lucia Tattoli & Pasquale Stefanizzi & Francesco Paolo Bianchi & Silvio Tafuri & Fiorenza Zotti & Alessandro Dell’Erba, 2020. "Incident Reporting System in an Italian University Hospital: A New Tool for Improving Patient Safety," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-12, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marlene Manuela Moreira Ferreira & Andreia Sofia Costa Teixeira & Tiago Salgado de Magalhães Taveira-Gomes, 2022. "Safety Climate Evaluation in Primary Health Care: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-20, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Davide Ferorelli & Lorenzo Moretti & Marcello Benevento & Maurizio Mastrapasqua & Michele Telegrafo & Biagio Solarino & Alessandro Dell’Erba & Davide Bizzoca & Biagio Moretti, 2022. "Digital Health Care, Telemedicine, and Medicolegal Issues in Orthopedics: A Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-9, November.
    2. Reader, Tom W., 2022. "Stakeholder safety communication: patient and family reports on safety risks in hospitals," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 114624, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Taku Harada & Taiju Miyagami & Kotaro Kunitomo & Taro Shimizu, 2021. "Clinical Decision Support Systems for Diagnosis in Primary Care: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Francesco De Micco & Anna De Benedictis & Vittorio Fineschi & Paola Frati & Massimo Ciccozzi & Leandro Pecchia & Rossana Alloni & Nicola Petrosillo & Simonetta Filippi & Giampaolo Ghilardi & Laura Leo, 2021. "From Syndemic Lesson after COVID-19 Pandemic to a “Systemic Clinical Risk Management” Proposal in the Perspective of the Ethics of Job Well Done," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-6, December.
    5. Mari Liukka & Markku Hupli & Hannele Turunen, 2019. "Problems with incident reporting: Reports lead rarely to recommendations," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1607-1613, May.
    6. Yanjia Li & Keyi Zhou & Siyuan Tang & Jiarui Chen, 2023. "Intimate Partner Violence Screening Instruments: A Protocol for a COSMIN-Based Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-9, January.
    7. Maritta Välimäki & Yuen Ting Joyce Lam & Kirsi Hipp & Po Yee Ivy Cheng & Tony Ng & Glendy Ip & Paul Lee & Teris Cheung & Daniel Bressington & Tella Lantta, 2022. "Physical Restraint Events in Psychiatric Hospitals in Hong Kong: A Cohort Register Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-14, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:17:p:8941-:d:621510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.