Author
Listed:
- Shiran Bord
(Health Systems Management Department, The Max Stern Yezreel Valley College, Yezreel Valley 1930600, Israel)
- Ayelet Schor
(Health Systems Management Department, The Max Stern Yezreel Valley College, Yezreel Valley 1930600, Israel)
- Carmit Satran
(Nursing Department, The Max Stern Yezreel Valley College, Yezreel Valley 1930600, Israel)
- Ola Ali Saleh
(Health Systems Management Department, The Max Stern Yezreel Valley College, Yezreel Valley 1930600, Israel
Nursing Department, The Max Stern Yezreel Valley College, Yezreel Valley 1930600, Israel)
- Liron Inchi
(Health Systems Management Department, The Max Stern Yezreel Valley College, Yezreel Valley 1930600, Israel)
- Dafna Halperin
(Health Systems Management Department, The Max Stern Yezreel Valley College, Yezreel Valley 1930600, Israel)
Abstract
Social distancing was found to prevent COVID-19 contagion. Therefore, understanding the factors associated with the public’s adherence is important. Acknowledging the importance of emotional wellbeing regarding older people’s health, and understanding their emotional state during the pandemic, are crucial. This study assessed factors associated with older people’s adherence to social distancing and their emotional status. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 1822 respondents above the age of 60. Distancing adherence, negative emotion, trust, social support, threat perception, attitudes, and subjective norms were assessed, and a path analysis was performed. Adherence was positively associated with attitudes (β = 0.10; p < 0.001), and with subjective norms (β = 0.19; p < 0.001). Negative emotions were positively associated with threat perception (β = 0.33; p < 0.001), and negatively associated with social support (β = −0.13; p < 0.001) and subjective norms (β = −0.10; p < 0.001). Attitudes mediated the relationship of threat perception (95% CI = 0.009, 0.034), trust (95% CI = 0.008, 0.029), and social support (95% CI = 0.006, 0.023) with distancing adherence. Subjective norms mediated the relationship between threat perception (95% CI = 0.014, 0.034), trust (95% CI = 0.026, 0.055), and social support (95% CI = 0.002, 0.048) with distancing adherence. Subjective norms mediated the relationship between threat perception (95% CI = −0.022, −0.006), trust (95% CI = −0.034, −0.010), and social support (95% CI = −0.029, −0.009) with negative emotions. When promoting social distancing adherence, subjective norms and attitudes must be considered, as they play a role in promoting adherence and negative-emotion regulation.
Suggested Citation
Shiran Bord & Ayelet Schor & Carmit Satran & Ola Ali Saleh & Liron Inchi & Dafna Halperin, 2021.
"Distancing Adherence and Negative Emotions among the Israeli Elderly Population during the COVID-19 Pandemic,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-12, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8770-:d:617815
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Talia Goren & Dana R. Vashdi & Itai Beeri, 2022.
"Count on trust: the indirect effect of trust in government on policy compliance with health behavior instructions,"
Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 55(4), pages 593-630, December.
- Mohammad Khatib & Ivonne Mansbach-Kleinfeld & Doaa Zaid & Anneke Ifrah & Malik Yousef & Ahmad Sheikh Muhammad, 2023.
"Compliance with COVID-19 Regulations among Palestinian Citizens of Israel in the Context of Social Norms and Gender Roles,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8770-:d:617815. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.