IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i16p8641-d615368.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Affecting Learning Satisfaction in Face-to-Face and Non-Face-to-Face Flipped Learning among Nursing Students

Author

Listed:
  • Mi-Kyoung Cho

    (Department of Nursing Science, Chungbuk National University, 1 Chungdae-ro, Seowon-gu, Cheongju 28644, Korea)

  • Mi Young Kim

    (College of Nursing, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, Korea)

Abstract

Factors influencing students’ learning satisfaction may differ between face-to-face and non-face-to-face flipped learning. For non-face-to-face flipped learning, which was widely employed during the COVID-19 pandemic, it is necessary to examine the impacts on learning satisfaction, which may vary depending on professor–student interaction rather than individual competencies, such as SDL readiness. This descriptive study, conducted 2 March 2019 to 24 June 2020, included 89 s-year, flipped-learning nursing students (28 face-to-face, 61 non-face-to-face). Students completed questionnaires about learning satisfaction, SDL readiness, and professor–student interaction. The data, collected using e-surveys, were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t -test, ANOVA, Pearson’s correlation, and multiple stepwise regression with IBM’s SPSS Statistics 25.0 program. The total average score of learning satisfaction (38.19 ± 6.04) was positively correlated with SDL readiness ( r = 0.56, p < 0.001) and professor–student interaction ( r = 0.36, p = 0.001), although total learning satisfaction was significantly different between the face-to-face and the non-face-to-face groups ( t = 5.28, p = 0.024). They were also significant influencing factors, along with face-to-face flipped learning, for total learning satisfaction ( F = 18.00, p < 0.001, explanatory power = 36.7%), suggesting flipped learners in non-face-to-face contexts must increase engagement beyond professor–student interaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Mi-Kyoung Cho & Mi Young Kim, 2021. "Factors Affecting Learning Satisfaction in Face-to-Face and Non-Face-to-Face Flipped Learning among Nursing Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-13, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8641-:d:615368
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/16/8641/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/16/8641/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tri Siswati & Slamet Iskandar & Nova Pramestuti & Jarohman Raharjo & Muhammad Primiaji Rialihanto & Agus Kharmayana Rubaya & Bayu Satria Wiratama, 2022. "Effect of a Short Course on Improving the Cadres’ Knowledge in the Context of Reducing Stunting through Home Visits in Yogyakarta, Indonesia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-10, August.
    2. Blanca Rueda-Medina & María Encarnación Aguilar-Ferrándiz & Ana Alejandra Esteban-Burgos & Rosa María Tapia Haro & Antonio Casas-Barragán & Almudena Velando-Soriano & Rocío Gil-Gutiérrez & María Corre, 2022. "Impact of Non-Face-to-Face Teaching with Passive Training on Personal Protective Equipment Use in Health Science Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-12, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8641-:d:615368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.