IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i16p8550-d613684.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Actual One-Month Usage of Portable Listening Devices in College Students

Author

Listed:
  • Gibbeum Kim

    (Department of Speech and Hearing Science, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA
    Laboratory of Hearing and Technology, Research Institute of Audiology and Speech Pathology, College of Natural Sciences, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea
    Division of Speech Pathology and Audiology, College of Natural Sciences, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea)

  • Jihun Shin

    (Department of Convergence Software, Graduate School, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea)

  • Changgeun Song

    (Department of Convergence Software, College of Information and Electronic Engineering, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea)

  • Woojae Han

    (Laboratory of Hearing and Technology, Research Institute of Audiology and Speech Pathology, College of Natural Sciences, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea
    Division of Speech Pathology and Audiology, College of Natural Sciences, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea)

Abstract

Although contemporary researchers are concerned about overexposure of portable listening devices (PLD) for adolescents and young adults who often prefer listening to music at high levels for a long time, many of these studies have focused on either comparing sound pressure levels of various kinds of earphones or evaluating the recognition of noise-included hearing loss and listening habits through surveys. Further still, current criteria were developed for occupational noise-induced hearing loss, so there are only a few published guidelines for hearing insults due to recreational noise exposure. The present study, therefore, measures actual listening levels and PLD time in college students using a real-time measurement system and applying that gathered scientific data to the internationally recommended noise exposure standards. Thirty-four college students were asked to listen to music similar to their daily lifestyles for 4-weeks. After installing the application, the Google account that linked to the user’s mobile phone was logged into the server communication. When a subject listened to music, the average and maximum listening levels and listening time could then be recognized as his or her Google account ID and stored in the database for analysis. User data was measured at 1-s intervals and delivered to the main server system every 5 s. The data were analyzed as LZeq for mean levels and LCpeak for maximum levels, and also for PLD use time. The mean of the preferred listening level was 68–70 dB SPL for 4 weeks with long enough break times. That is, the listening levels of college students were not high enough to induce instant hearing loss when they used PLD. However, there was a large individual difference in the listening levels and use times. When applied to three recommended noise exposure criteria, the number of exceeded subjects also differed from 0 to 56.72% depending on the criterion. We thus suggest that appropriate and standardized criteria for music-induced hearing loss might be proposed for recreational PLD users.

Suggested Citation

  • Gibbeum Kim & Jihun Shin & Changgeun Song & Woojae Han, 2021. "Analysis of the Actual One-Month Usage of Portable Listening Devices in College Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-11, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8550-:d:613684
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/16/8550/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/16/8550/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sunghwa You & Chanbeom Kwak & Woojae Han, 2020. "Use of Personal Listening Devices and Knowledge/Attitude for Greater Hearing Conservation in College Students: Data Analysis and Regression Model Based on 1009 Respondents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-23, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dahui Wang & Chenhui Li & Yi Wang & Shichang Wang & Shuang Wu & Shiyan Zhang & Liangwen Xu, 2021. "Health Education Intervention on Hearing Health Risk Behaviors in College Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-10, February.
    2. Fei Chen & Hui Xue & Meng Wang & Zhiling Cai & Shipeng Zhu, 2023. "Hearing Care: Safe Listening Method and System for Personal Listening Devices," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Nicola Diviani & Shelly Chadha & Malachi Ochieng Arunda & Sara Rubinelli, 2021. "Attitudes towards Safe Listening Measures in Entertainment Venues: Results from an International Survey among Young Venue-Goers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Junghwa Bahng & Chang Heon Lee, 2020. "Topic Modeling for Analyzing Patients’ Perceptions and Concerns of Hearing Loss on Social Q&A Sites: Incorporating Patients’ Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-14, August.
    5. Weronika Swierniak & Elzbieta Gos & Piotr Henryk Skarzynski & Natalia Czajka & Henryk Skarzynski, 2020. "Personal Music Players Use and Other Noise Hazards among Children 11 to 12 Years Old," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-10, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8550-:d:613684. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.