IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i15p8053-d604511.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determination of the Strongest Factor and Component in a Relationship between Lower-Extremity Assessment Protocol and Patient-Oriented Outcomes in Individuals with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Pilot Study

Author

Listed:
  • Hyung Gyu Jeon

    (Department of Physical Education, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea
    International Olympic Committee Research Centre Korea, Seoul 03722, Korea)

  • Byong Hun Kim

    (Department of Physical Education, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea
    International Olympic Committee Research Centre Korea, Seoul 03722, Korea)

  • Tae Kyu Kang

    (Department of Physical Education, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea
    International Olympic Committee Research Centre Korea, Seoul 03722, Korea)

  • Hee Seong Jeong

    (Department of Physical Education, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea
    International Olympic Committee Research Centre Korea, Seoul 03722, Korea
    The co-corresponding authors (Hee Seong Jeong and Sae Yong Lee) contributed equally to this work.)

  • Sae Yong Lee

    (Department of Physical Education, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea
    International Olympic Committee Research Centre Korea, Seoul 03722, Korea
    Institute of Convergence Science, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea
    The co-corresponding authors (Hee Seong Jeong and Sae Yong Lee) contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Although the Lower-Extremity Assessment Protocol (LEAP) assesses multidimensional aspects of a patient with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, there is a need to reduce the dimensionality of LEAP items to effectively assess patients. Therefore, the present study aimed to establish the validity of LEAP and to determine associated factors and components in a relationship between LEAP and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaire. Fifteen patients who had ACL reconstruction more than 1 year and less than 5 years earlier were recruited. Patients performed LEAP, including muscular strength, fatigue index, static balance, drop landing, and functional hopping assessment. They also completed the IKDC questionnaire and the Tegner Activity Score. Factor analysis and stepwise regression analysis were performed. The 14 components of LEAP were categorized into four factors (functional task, muscle strength, neuromuscular control, and fatigue), which accounted for 83.8% of the cumulative variance by factor analysis. In the stepwise regression analysis, the functional task ( R 2 = 0.43, p = 0.008) in factors and single-leg hop ( R 2 = 0.49, p = 0.004) in components were associated with patient-oriented outcomes, respectively. In conclusion, the functional task and single-leg hop may be used for providing valuable information about knee joints to patients and clinicians.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyung Gyu Jeon & Byong Hun Kim & Tae Kyu Kang & Hee Seong Jeong & Sae Yong Lee, 2021. "Determination of the Strongest Factor and Component in a Relationship between Lower-Extremity Assessment Protocol and Patient-Oriented Outcomes in Individuals with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstru," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-12, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:15:p:8053-:d:604511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/8053/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/8053/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maciej Kochman & Marta Kasprzak & Aleksandra Kielar, 2022. "ACL Reconstruction: Which Additional Physiotherapy Interventions Improve Early-Stage Rehabilitation? A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-18, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:15:p:8053-:d:604511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.