IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i15p7942-d602423.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prevalence and Predictors of Willingness to Make Advance Directives among Macao Chinese

Author

Listed:
  • Sok Man Leong

    (Education Department, Kiang Wu Nursing College of Macau, Macao SAR, China)

  • Kuai In Tam

    (Research Management and Development Department, Kiang Wu Nursing College of Macau, Macao SAR, China)

  • Sok Leng Che

    (Nursing and Health Education Research Centre, Kiang Wu Nursing College of Macau, Macao SAR, China)

  • Ming Xia Zhu

    (Education Department, Kiang Wu Nursing College of Macau, Macao SAR, China)

Abstract

While advance directives (ADs) are considered to be part of government’s healthcare agenda, there has not been any public consultation for legislation, nor investigation regarding the public’s views about ADs in the Chinese culture of Macao. The current study explored the Macao Chinese people’s willingness to make ADs. Data were collected from 724 residents aged 18 years and above. Results showed that 533 respondents (73.6%) claimed that they were willing to complete an AD if the document was recognized legally. The experience of caring for relatives or friends with terminal illnesses, palliative care as the preferred end-of-life treatment option, and scoring higher in the Hospice Care Attitude Scale were the predictors of willingness to make ADs. Results of the study suggested that there was a relatively high number of people who would consider setting up ADs. Our study recommends that healthcare professionals should equip themselves to raise ADs-related discussions with patients. Moreover, the Macao Government is responsible for facilitating the introduction and implementation of ADs in order to improve overall end-of-life care quality in Macao.

Suggested Citation

  • Sok Man Leong & Kuai In Tam & Sok Leng Che & Ming Xia Zhu, 2021. "Prevalence and Predictors of Willingness to Make Advance Directives among Macao Chinese," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-11, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:15:p:7942-:d:602423
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/7942/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/7942/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carmen W. H. Chan & Martin M. H. Wong & Kai Chow Choi & Helen Y. L. Chan & Amy Y. M. Chow & Raymond S. K. Lo & Michael M. K. Sham, 2019. "Prevalence, Perception, and Predictors of Advance Directives among Hong Kong Chinese: A Population-Based Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuexi Yang & Tingting Qu & Jinyue Yang & Ben Ma & Anli Leng, 2022. "Confucian Familism and Shared Decision Making in End-of-Life Care for Patients with Advanced Cancers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Boram Kim & Jiyeon Choi & Ilhak Lee, 2022. "Factors Associated with Advance Directives Documentation: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey of Older Adults in Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Nina Tumosa, 2023. "Using the Age-Friendly Health Systems Framework to Track Wellness and Health Promotion Priorities of Older Adults in the Global Community," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-5, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suet Ying Ng & Eliza Lai-Yi Wong, 2021. "The Role Complexities in Advance Care Planning for End-of-Life Care—Nursing Students’ Perception of the Nursing Profession," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-13, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:15:p:7942-:d:602423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.