IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i14p7565-d595342.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethical Problems and Moral Distress in Primary Care: A Scoping Review

Author

Listed:
  • Noemi Giannetta

    (Faculty of Philosophy, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy)

  • Giulia Villa

    (Center for Nursing Research and Innovation, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy)

  • Federico Pennestrì

    (Faculty of Philosophy, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy)

  • Roberta Sala

    (Faculty of Philosophy, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy)

  • Roberto Mordacci

    (Faculty of Philosophy, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy)

  • Duilio Fiorenzo Manara

    (Center for Nursing Research and Innovation, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy)

Abstract

Background: Since 1997, nursing ethics research has focused on solving ethical dilemmas, enhancing decision-making strategies, and introducing professional education. Few studies describe the triggers of ethical dilemmas among primary care nurses. The aim of this study was to explore the moral distress and ethical dilemmas among primary care nurses. Methods: A scoping review was performed following Arskey and O’Malley’s framework. PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, and Scopus were searched systematically to retrieve relevant titles and abstracts. A temporal filter was applied to focus on the most recent literature (years of 2010–2020). The research was completed on 17 November 2020. Results: Of 184 articles retrieved, 15 were included in the review. Some ( n = 7) studies had a qualitative design, and the most productive country was Brazil ( n = 7). The total number of nurses involved in quantitative studies was 1137 (range: 36–433); the total number of nurses involved in qualitative studies was 144 (range: 7–73). Three main focus areas were identified: (a) frequent ethical conflicts and moral distress episodes among nurses working in primary care settings; (b) frequent moral distress measures here employed; (c) coping strategies here adopted to prevent or manage moral distress. Conclusion: Further research is needed to examine the differences between moral distress triggers and sources of ethical dilemmas among the different care environments, such as primary care and acute care settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Noemi Giannetta & Giulia Villa & Federico Pennestrì & Roberta Sala & Roberto Mordacci & Duilio Fiorenzo Manara, 2021. "Ethical Problems and Moral Distress in Primary Care: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-14, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:14:p:7565-:d:595342
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/14/7565/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/14/7565/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cordelia Cho & Wendy Y. K. Ko & Olivia M. Y. Ngan & Wai Tat Wong, 2022. "Exploring Professionalism Dilemma and Moral Distress through Medical Students’ Eyes: A Mixed-Method Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Risto Nikunlaakso & Kirsikka Selander & Elina Weiste & Eveliina Korkiakangas & Maria Paavolainen & Tiina Koivisto & Jaana Laitinen, 2022. "Understanding Moral Distress among Eldercare Workers: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-14, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:14:p:7565-:d:595342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.