Author
Listed:
- Elizabeth Fireman
(Laboratory for Pulmonary and Allergic Diseases, Tel-Aviv Medical Centre, Tel-Aviv 6423906, Israel
Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel)
- Abed Elrahman Mahamed
(Laboratory for Pulmonary and Allergic Diseases, Tel-Aviv Medical Centre, Tel-Aviv 6423906, Israel
Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel
Institute of Pulmonary Diseases, Rabin Medical Centre, Petah Tekvah 4947492, Israel, both affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel)
- Dror Rosengarten
(Institute of Pulmonary Diseases, Rabin Medical Centre, Petah Tekvah 4947492, Israel, both affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel
These authors contributed equally.)
- Noa Noach Ophir
(Laboratory for Pulmonary and Allergic Diseases, Tel-Aviv Medical Centre, Tel-Aviv 6423906, Israel
Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel)
- Mordechai Reuven Kramer
(Institute of Pulmonary Diseases, Rabin Medical Centre, Petah Tekvah 4947492, Israel, both affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel
These authors contributed equally.)
Abstract
Spectrophotometric techniques provide qualitative but not quantitative data on lung particles. We aimed to quantitate silica content in biopsies of lung-transplanted silicosis patients by applying X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometry. Lung biopsies of 17 lung-transplanted artificial patients were quantitated for silica and other minerals particles by Niton XL3 XRF spectrometry. Occupational and clinical history data were assessed. Lung biopsies of artificial stone-induced silicosis (ASIS) patients contained significantly higher levels of silica compared to those of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients (7284.29 ± 4693.75 ppm vs. 898.88 ± 365.66 ppm, p < 0.0001). Silica content correlated negatively with age, body mass index, and pulmonary function test results. A 1128 ppm silica cut-off value yielded 100% sensitivity and 94% specificity for predicting ASIS (AUC = 0.94, p < 0.0001). In conclusion, XRF measurements in lung biopsies can differentiate between silica and mineral particles in ASIS and IPF.
Suggested Citation
Elizabeth Fireman & Abed Elrahman Mahamed & Dror Rosengarten & Noa Noach Ophir & Mordechai Reuven Kramer, 2021.
"Quantitation of Silica Contents in Lung Explants of Transplanted Patients: Artificial Stone-Induced Silicosis vs. Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-8, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:14:p:7237-:d:589499
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:14:p:7237-:d:589499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.