IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i13p7190-d588637.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Earplugs in Preventing Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in an Auto Parts Factory in China

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Gong

    (Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing 210009, China)

  • Liangliang Zhao

    (Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing 210009, China)

  • Ling Li

    (Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing 210009, China)

  • Thais C. Morata

    (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Cincinnati, OH 45226, USA)

  • Wei Qiu

    (Auditory Research Laboratories, State University of New York at Plattsburgh, Plattsburgh, NY 12903, USA)

  • Huiling Amy Feng

    (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Cincinnati, OH 45226, USA)

  • Baoli Zhu

    (Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China)

Abstract

A survey was administered to 385 noise-exposed workers from an auto parts factory and 1268 non-noise-exposed health department employees in China. Individual 8 h A-weighted equivalent sound levels (L Aeq,8h ), earplug personal attenuation ratings (PARs), and pure-tone audiometric tests were performed. The average L Aeq,8h of noise-exposed workers was 87 dB (A) with a mean PAR of 7 dB. The prevalence of high-frequency hearing loss was 65% for noise-exposed workers and 33% for the non-noise-exposed employees. The use of earplugs had no observable effect on the prevalence of high-frequency hearing loss of the study participants (OR 0.964, 95% CI 0.925–1.005, p = 0.085). No significant relationship between the effectiveness offered by earplug use and high-frequency hearing thresholds at 3, 4, and 6 kHz was found (t = −1.54, p = 0.125). The mandatory requirement of earplug use without individualized training on how to wear HPDs correctly had no detectable effect on the prevention of hearing loss at the auto parts factory. The hearing conservation program at the surveyed factory was not effective. Periodic hearing tests, earplug fit testing, expanding the offer of different types of hearing protection, and employee education about the importance of protecting their hearing were recommended to the occupational health and safety program.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Gong & Liangliang Zhao & Ling Li & Thais C. Morata & Wei Qiu & Huiling Amy Feng & Baoli Zhu, 2021. "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Earplugs in Preventing Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in an Auto Parts Factory in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-14, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:7190-:d:588637
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/7190/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/7190/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chien-Chen Chiu & Terng-Jou Wan, 2020. "Individual Fit Testing of Hearing-Protection Devices Based on Microphones in Real Ears among Workers in Industries with High-Noise-Level Manufacturing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-11, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emil Kozlowski & Rafal Mlynski & Leszek Morzynski & Adam Swidzinski, 2022. "A Tester to Evaluate the Correct Placement of Earplugs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-15, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:7190-:d:588637. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.