IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i13p7133-d587977.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feasibility, Safety, and Satisfaction of Combined Hysterectomy with Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy and Chest Surgery in Transgender and Gender Non-Conforming Individuals

Author

Listed:
  • Ilaria Mancini

    (Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
    Gynecology and Physiopathology of Human Reproduction Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy)

  • Davide Tarditi

    (Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
    Gynecology and Physiopathology of Human Reproduction Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy)

  • Giulia Gava

    (Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
    Gynecology and Physiopathology of Human Reproduction Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy)

  • Stefania Alvisi

    (Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
    Gynecology and Physiopathology of Human Reproduction Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy)

  • Luca Contu

    (Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
    Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery Department S. Orsola–Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum–University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy)

  • Paolo Giovanni Morselli

    (Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
    Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery Department S. Orsola–Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum–University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy)

  • Giulia Giacomelli

    (Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
    Gynecology and Physiopathology of Human Reproduction Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy)

  • Alessandra Lami

    (Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
    Gynecology and Physiopathology of Human Reproduction Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy)

  • Renato Seracchioli

    (Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
    Gynecology and Physiopathology of Human Reproduction Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy)

  • Maria Cristina Meriggiola

    (Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
    Gynecology and Physiopathology of Human Reproduction Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy)

Abstract

The demand for masculinizing breast surgery and hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (HBSO) from transmen has increased. With a multidisciplinary approach, these surgeries can be performed in a single session. The objective of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the feasibility, safety, and satisfaction of HBSO and chest surgery in transmen. A cohort of 142 subjects who underwent HBSO alone or combined with chest surgery at Sant’Orsola Hospital was analyzed. Intra and post operation events were evaluated. Subjective post-intervention satisfaction, acceptability, and impact of intervention were assessed via a semi-structured interview. Nineteen transmen underwent HBSO alone and 123 underwent combined surgery. HBSO was performed laparoscopically in 96.5% of transmen (137/142). As expected, length of hospital stay and blood loss were significantly higher in the combined surgery group. A total of 13 intra or post-operative complications occurred in the combined surgery group (10.5%) with thoracic hematoma being the most frequent complication (7.6%). Only one rare complication occurred in the HBSO group (omental herniation through a laparoscopic breach). The overall subjective satisfaction score was 9.9 out of 10 for both groups. Positive changes in all areas of life were reported, with no significant differences. We found that the combined surgery appears to be well tolerated, safe, and feasible in transmen and satisfaction with the combined procedure was high in all subjects.

Suggested Citation

  • Ilaria Mancini & Davide Tarditi & Giulia Gava & Stefania Alvisi & Luca Contu & Paolo Giovanni Morselli & Giulia Giacomelli & Alessandra Lami & Renato Seracchioli & Maria Cristina Meriggiola, 2021. "Feasibility, Safety, and Satisfaction of Combined Hysterectomy with Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy and Chest Surgery in Transgender and Gender Non-Conforming Individuals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-13, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:7133-:d:587977
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/7133/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/7133/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:7133-:d:587977. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.