IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i13p7015-d585767.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self-Isolation and Quarantine during the UK’s First Wave of COVID-19. A Mixed-Methods Study of Non-Adherence

Author

Listed:
  • Yolanda Eraso

    (School of Social Professions, London Metropolitan University, London N7 8DB, UK)

  • Stephen Hills

    (Guildhall School of Business and Law, London Metropolitan University, London N7 8DB, UK)

Abstract

Self-isolation and quarantine measures were introduced by the UK Government on 12 March 2020 as part of the ‘delay’ phase to control the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Non-adherence to self-isolation for 7 days after the development of symptoms is considered suboptimal and little is known about adherence to quarantine for 14 days if a co-habitant developed symptoms. This study aims to analyse non-adherence behaviours to self-isolation and quarantine measures by identifying their potential psycho-social and demographic predictors and by exploring people’s accounts of their experiences with these measures. A mixed-methods convergent design was used, comprising an online survey ( n = 681) completed by residents in six North London boroughs and qualitative interviews with a subsample of participants ( n = 16). Findings identified not accessing community support, lack of control over leaving the house, and lack of perceived benefit and need to follow the rules as behaviours associated with non-adherence to quarantine (42.7%). Non-adherence to self-isolating measures (24.4%) was associated with individuals’ perceived lack of control over responsibilities, lack of control over leaving the house, uncertainty about symptoms experienced, lack of access to tests, and distrust in the Government. Adherence to self-isolation and quarantine could be improved through strengthening perceived benefit to self-isolate with messages emphasising its effectiveness, by implementing a two-way information system to support symptoms identification, and with Government-funded, locally supported packages at different levels (financial, food, and practical needs).

Suggested Citation

  • Yolanda Eraso & Stephen Hills, 2021. "Self-Isolation and Quarantine during the UK’s First Wave of COVID-19. A Mixed-Methods Study of Non-Adherence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-20, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:7015-:d:585767
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/7015/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/7015/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yolanda Eraso & Stephen Hills, 2021. "Intentional and unintentional non-adherence to social distancing measures during COVID-19: A mixed-methods analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(8), pages 1-29, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anne Marie Novak & Adi Katz & Michal Bitan & Shahar Lev-Ari, 2022. "The Association between the Sense of Coherence and the Self-Reported Adherence to Guidelines during the First Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Israel," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-13, June.
    2. Jinhai Li & Yunlei Ma & Xinglong Xu & Jiaming Pei & Youshi He, 2022. "A Study on Epidemic Information Screening, Prevention and Control of Public Opinion Based on Health and Medical Big Data: A Case Study of COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-21, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:7015-:d:585767. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.