IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i12p6604-d577973.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study of Patients’ Willingness to Pay for a Basic Outpatient Copayment and Medical Service Quality in Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Hsu

    (Department of Health Care Management, National Taipei University of Nursing & Health Sciences, Beitou, Taipei 112303, Taiwan)

  • Chih-Hao Yang

    (Department of Accounting, Ming Chuan University, Shilin, Taipei 111005, Taiwan)

  • Wen-Ping Fan

    (Department of Health Care Management, National Taipei University of Nursing & Health Sciences, Beitou, Taipei 112303, Taiwan)

Abstract

Patients might be willing to pay more to obtain better quality medical services when they recognize that high-level hospitals have better quality. However, published papers have not found solid empirical evidence to support this possibility. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to empirically investigate patients’ willingness to pay (WTP) for an outpatient copayment. The study aims to analyze the difference between the two WTP values: to implement a hierarchy of medical care and to improve the quality of medical services. This study administered a questionnaire using the contingent valuation method with a quasi-bidding game for patients’ WTP and the SERVQUAL scale for medical service quality. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was employed to test the difference between the two WTP values, notably to implement a hierarchy of medical care and to improve the quality of medical services. Both of the WTP values are higher than the academic medical centre’s current copayment NT$420 (approximately US$14); the percentage of respondents willing to pay a higher copayment declined when the outpatient copayment was increased, and the patients’ WTP to have better medical service quality was significantly higher than that to implement a hierarchy of medical care. Patients’ desire to receive better medical services from higher-level hospitals might be stronger than their desire to implement hierarchical medical care. This study reported the relationship between the respondents’ perceived medical service quality and WTP for having better service quality by using regression models. The respondents’ perceptions of medical service quality, especially for “reliability” and “assurance,” would positively affect their WTP. Policy makers should focus on improving the quality of medical services.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Hsu & Chih-Hao Yang & Wen-Ping Fan, 2021. "A Study of Patients’ Willingness to Pay for a Basic Outpatient Copayment and Medical Service Quality in Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-12, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:12:p:6604-:d:577973
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/12/6604/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/12/6604/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hui‐Chu Lang & Koyin Chang & Yung‐Hsiang Ying, 2012. "Quality Of Life, Treatments, And Patients' Willingness To Pay For A Complete Remission Of Cervical Cancer In Taiwan," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(10), pages 1217-1233, October.
    2. Stanisława Golinowska & Marzena Tambor, 2012. "Out-of-pocket payments on health in Poland: Size, tendency and willingness to pay," Society and Economy, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 34(2), pages 253-271, June.
    3. Richard D. Smith, 2003. "Construction of the contingent valuation market in health care:a critical assessment," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(8), pages 609-628, August.
    4. Linda Ryen & Mikael Svensson, 2015. "The Willingness to Pay for a Quality Adjusted Life Year: A Review of the Empirical Literature," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(10), pages 1289-1301, October.
    5. David Mark Dror, 2018. "Systematic Review of Willingness to Pay for Health Insurance in Low and Middle Income Countries," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Financing Micro Health Insurance Theory, Methods and Evidence, chapter 8, pages 151-168, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    6. Al-Hanawi, Mohammed K. & Alsharqi, Omar & Vaidya, Kirit, 2020. "Willingness to pay for improved public health care services in Saudi Arabia: a contingent valuation study among heads of Saudi households," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(1), pages 72-93, January.
    7. Yadong Niu & Ting Ye & Yan Zhang & Liang Zhang, 2019. "Can Primary Medical Institutions Lead to Worse Health Status for Patients with Noncommunicable Diseases Compared with High-Level Hospitals? A Follow-Up Observation Study in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-9, April.
    8. Jens-Oliver Bock & Dirk Heider & Herbert Matschinger & Hermann Brenner & Kai-Uwe Saum & Walter Haefeli & Hans-Helmut König, 2016. "Willingness to pay for health insurance among the elderly population in Germany," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 17(2), pages 149-158, March.
    9. Bateman, Ian J. & Willis, Kenneth G. (ed.), 2001. "Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU , and developing Countries," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199248919.
    10. Gaal, Peter & Evetovits, Tamas & McKee, Martin, 2006. "Informal payment for health care: Evidence from Hungary," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 86-102, June.
    11. Kurt Lavetti & Kosali Simon & William D. White, 2014. "Taxpayer Willingness To Pay For Health Insurance Reform: A Contingent Valuation Analysis," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 52(3), pages 994-1013, July.
    12. Klose, Thomas, 1999. "The contingent valuation method in health care," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 97-123, May.
    13. Baji, Petra & Pavlova, Milena & Gulácsi, LászlÓ & Groot, Wim, 2011. "User fees for public health care services in Hungary: Expectations, experience, and acceptability from the perspectives of different stakeholders," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 255-262.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alene Sze Jing Yong & Yi Heng Lim & Mark Wing Loong Cheong & Ednin Hamzah & Siew Li Teoh, 2022. "Willingness-to-pay for cancer treatment and outcome: a systematic review," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(6), pages 1037-1057, August.
    2. Giannouchos, Theodoros V. & Ukert, Benjamin & Vozikis, Athanassios & Steletou, Evangelia & Souliotis, Kyriakos, 2021. "Informal out-of-pocket payments experience and individuals’ willingness-to-pay for healthcare services in Greece," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(6), pages 693-700.
    3. Caroline Steigenberger & Magdalena Flatscher-Thoeni & Uwe Siebert & Andrea M. Leiter, 2022. "Determinants of willingness to pay for health services: a systematic review of contingent valuation studies," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(9), pages 1455-1482, December.
    4. Mayam Moeeni & Shirin Nosratnejad, 2019. "Never will I give advice till you please to ask me thrice: Estimating willingness to pay for health insurance using 3 different methods with evidence from Iran," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 594-601, January.
    5. Marc Fleurbaey & Stéphane Luchini & Christophe Muller & Erik Schokkaert, 2013. "Equivalent Income And Fair Evaluation Of Health Care," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(6), pages 711-729, June.
    6. Williams, Colin C. & Horodnic, Adrian V., 2017. "Rethinking informal payments by patients in Europe: An institutional approach," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(10), pages 1053-1062.
    7. Watson, Verity & Ryan, Mandy, 2007. "Exploring preference anomalies in double bounded contingent valuation," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 463-482, May.
    8. Smith, Richard D. & Richardson, Jeff, 2005. "Can we estimate the `social' value of a QALY?: Four core issues to resolve," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 77-84, September.
    9. repec:cup:judgdm:v:2:y:2007:i::p:96-106 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Tambor, Marzena & Pavlova, Milena & Rechel, Bernd & Golinowska, Stanisława & Sowada, Christoph & Groot, Wim, 2014. "Willingness to pay for publicly financed health care services in Central and Eastern Europe: Evidence from six countries based on a contingent valuation method," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 193-201.
    11. Powdthavee, Nattavudh & van den Berg, Bernard, 2011. "Putting different price tags on the same health condition: Re-evaluating the well-being valuation approach," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 1032-1043.
    12. Mandy Ryan & Mabelle Amaya‐Amaya, 2005. "‘Threats’ to and hopes for estimating benefits," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(6), pages 609-619, June.
    13. Richard D. Smith, 2007. "The role of 'reference goods' in contingent valuation: should we help respondents to 'construct' their willingness to pay?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(12), pages 1319-1332.
    14. Laura J. Damschroder & Peter A. Ubel & Jason Riis & Dylan M. Smith, 2007. "An alternative approach for eliciting willingness-to-pay: A randomized Internet trial," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 2, pages 96-106, April.
    15. Najme Moradi & Arash Rashidian & Shirin Nosratnejad & Alireza Olyaeemanesh & Marzieh Zanganeh & Leila Zarei, 2019. "The Worth of a Quality-Adjusted Life-Year in Patients with Diabetes: An Investigation Study using a Willingness-to-Pay Method," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 3(3), pages 311-319, September.
    16. Greenberg, Dan & Bakhai, Ameet & Neumann, Peter J. & Cohen, David J., 2004. "Willingness to pay for avoiding coronary restenosis and repeat revascularization: results from a contingent valuation study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 207-216, November.
    17. Whynes, David K. & Sach, Tracey H., 2007. "WTP and WTA: Do people think differently?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 946-957, September.
    18. Richard D. Smith, 2007. "The relationship between reliability and size of willingness‐to‐pay values: a qualitative insight," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(2), pages 211-216, February.
    19. Tan, Ruipeng & Lin, Boqiang, 2019. "Public perception of new energy vehicles: Evidence from willingness to pay for new energy bus fares in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 347-354.
    20. Richard D. Smith, 2007. "The role of ‘reference goods’ in contingent valuation: should we help respondents to ‘construct’ their willingness to pay?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(12), pages 1319-1332, December.
    21. Zhi‐Nan Lu & Mingyuan Zhao & Yunxia Guo & Yu Hao, 2022. "Evaluating PM2.5‐Related health costs in China—Evidence from 140 Chinese cities," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 2376-2394, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:12:p:6604-:d:577973. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.