IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i12p6437-d574864.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of a Filtering Facepiece Respirator and a Pleated Particulate Respirator in Filtering Ultrafine Particles and Submicron Particles in Welding and Asphalt Plant Work Environments

Author

Listed:
  • Aniruddha Mitra

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Southern University, P.O. Box 8046, Statesboro, GA 30460, USA)

  • Atin Adhikari

    (Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, P.O. Box 8015, Statesboro, GA 30460, USA)

  • Clinton Martin

    (Department of Civil Engineering & Construction Management, Georgia Southern University, P.O. Box 8077, Statesboro, GA 30460, USA)

  • Gracia Dardano

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Southern University, P.O. Box 8046, Statesboro, GA 30460, USA)

  • Pascal Wagemaker

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Southern University, P.O. Box 8046, Statesboro, GA 30460, USA)

  • Caleb Adeoye

    (Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, P.O. Box 8015, Statesboro, GA 30460, USA)

Abstract

Manufacturing sites, such as welding, casting, and asphalt production (fumes), generate vast numbers of ultrafine particles of <0.1 µm in size and submicron particles close to the ultrafine range (0.1–0.5 µm). Although cumulative masses of these particles are negligible in comparison to the larger particles, the health effects are more severe due to the higher penetration in the human lower respiratory tract, other body parts crossing the respiratory epithelial layers, and the larger surface area. This research investigates the effectiveness of two common commercially available N95 filtering facepieces and N95 pleated particulate respirator models against ultrafine and submicron particles. Two specific types of respirators, the N95 filtering facepiece and the N95 pleated particulate models, in both sealed and unsealed conditions to the manikin face, were tested at various commercial and academic manufacturing sites, a welding and foundry site, and an asphalt production plant. Two TSI Nanoscan SMPS nanoparticle counters were used simultaneously to collect data for particles of 10–420 nm in size from inside and outside of the respirators. While one of them represented the workplace exposure levels, the other one accounted for the exposure upon filtration through the respiratory surfaces. The results showed the particles generated by these manufacturing operations were mostly within the range of from 40 to 200 nm. Results also indicated that while the percentage of filtration levels varied based on the particle size, it remained mostly within the desired protection level of 95% for both of the N95 respirator models in sealed conditions and even for the N95 pleated particulate model in the unsealed condition. However, in the case of the N95 filtering facepiece model, unsealed respirators showed that the percentage of penetration was very high, decreasing the protection levels to 60% in some cases. Although the number of workplace airborne particle levels varied considerably, the filtration percentages were relatively consistent.

Suggested Citation

  • Aniruddha Mitra & Atin Adhikari & Clinton Martin & Gracia Dardano & Pascal Wagemaker & Caleb Adeoye, 2021. "Evaluation of a Filtering Facepiece Respirator and a Pleated Particulate Respirator in Filtering Ultrafine Particles and Submicron Particles in Welding and Asphalt Plant Work Environments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-14, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:12:p:6437-:d:574864
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/12/6437/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/12/6437/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Atin Adhikari & Aniruddha Mitra & Abbas Rashidi & Imaobong Ekpo & Jacob Schwartz & Jefferson Doehling, 2018. "Field Evaluation of N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators on Construction Jobsites for Protection against Airborne Ultrafine Particles," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-15, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:12:p:6437-:d:574864. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.