IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i12p6421-d574536.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Brominated Flame Retardants in Children’s Room: Concentration, Composition, and Health Risk Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Douha Bannan

    (Faculty of Pharmacy, Pharmacy Practice, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)

  • Nadeem Ali

    (Center of Excellence in Environmental Studies, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)

  • Nabil A. Alhakamy

    (Pharmaceutics Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mohamed A. Alfaleh

    (Natural Products and Alternative Medicine Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)

  • Waleed S. Alharbi

    (Pharmaceutics Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)

  • Muhammad Imtiaz Rashid

    (Center of Excellence in Environmental Studies, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)

  • Nisreen Rajeh

    (Department of Anatomy, Medical College, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)

  • Govindan Malarvannan

    (Toxicological Center, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium)

Abstract

Children spend most of their daily time indoors. Many of the items used indoors, such as furniture, electronics, textile, and children toys, are treated with chemicals to provide longevity and fulfil the safety standards. However, many chemicals added to these products are released into the environment during leaching out from the treated products. Many studies have reported brominated flame retardants (BFRs) in indoor environments; however, few have focused on environments specified for young children. In this study, paired air (PM 10 ) and dust samples were collected from the rooms ( n = 30) of Saudi children. These samples were analyzed for different congeners of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and three important alternative flame retardants using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE 209) was the most important analyzed BFR in dust and PM 10 samples with a median value of 3150 ng/g of dust and 75 pg/m 3 . This indicates the wider application of BDE 209 has implications for its occurrence, although its use has been regulated for specified uses since 2014. Among alternative BFRs, 2-Ethylhexyl-2,3,4,5-tetrabromobenzoate (TBB), Bis(2-ethylhexyl)-3,4,5,6-tetrabromophthalate (TBPH), and 1,2-Bis(2,4,6-tribromophenoxy)ethane (BTBPE) were found with a median levels of 10, 15 and 8 ng/g of dust, respectively. However, alternative BFRs were present in <50% of the PM 10 samples. The calculated long term and daily exposures via indoor dust and PM 10 of Saudi children from their rooms were well below the respective reference dose (RfD) values. Nonetheless, the study highlights BDE 209 at higher levels than previously reported from household dust in Saudi Arabia. The study warrants further extensive research to estimate the different classes of chemical exposure to children from their rooms.

Suggested Citation

  • Douha Bannan & Nadeem Ali & Nabil A. Alhakamy & Mohamed A. Alfaleh & Waleed S. Alharbi & Muhammad Imtiaz Rashid & Nisreen Rajeh & Govindan Malarvannan, 2021. "Brominated Flame Retardants in Children’s Room: Concentration, Composition, and Health Risk Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-15, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:12:p:6421-:d:574536
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/12/6421/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/12/6421/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dingfan Hu & Juan Wu & Luosheng Fan & Shunyao Li & Rong Jia, 2022. "Aerobic Degradation Characteristics and Mechanism of Decabromodiphenyl Ether (BDE-209) Using Complex Bacteria Communities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-17, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:12:p:6421-:d:574536. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.