IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i11p5617-d561353.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Noise Disturbance and Potential Hearing Loss Due to Exposure of Dental Equipment in Flemish Dentists

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Dierickx

    (Department of Oral Health Sciences-Dentistry, KU Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium)

  • Suzanne Verschraegen

    (Department of Oral Health Sciences-Orthodontics, KU Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium)

  • Els Wierinck

    (Department of Oral Health Sciences-Dentistry, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium)

  • Guy Willems

    (Department of Oral Health Sciences-Orthodontics, KU Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium)

  • Astrid van Wieringen

    (Research Group Experimental Oto-rhino-laryngology, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium)

Abstract

Long-term exposure to occupational noise is often associated with noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) among dentists. This study aims to investigate potential hearing loss (HL) and self-reported annoyance as a result of exposure to noise produced by contemporary dental equipment. Methods: Three cohorts participated: 53 dentists with more than 5 years of service, 47 dentists with at most 5 years of service, and 53 pharmacists as controls, age and gender-matched to the first group. After the exclusion of one person, the hearing of 304 ears was screened with the Flemish version of the digit triplet in noise test (DTT). If screening failed, otoscopy and pure tone audiometry (PTA) were performed for both ears. Furthermore, general information, knowledge, exposure, annoyance, general health, and preventive measures were assessed with a custom-made questionnaire. Results: NIHL did not occur significantly more often with dentists than with controls. However, dentists revealed a significantly higher annoyance (related to the noise from their equipment) and reported more complaints than the pharmacists. All three groups indicated lack of knowledge on hearing care. Conclusions: While noise levels in contemporary dentistry are not harmful and do not induce NIHL, the sounds emitted by the devices are disturbing and affect mental health. This study calls for increased awareness of the consequences of sound exposure and stresses the need to monitor and protect the hearing of dentists regularly.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Dierickx & Suzanne Verschraegen & Els Wierinck & Guy Willems & Astrid van Wieringen, 2021. "Noise Disturbance and Potential Hearing Loss Due to Exposure of Dental Equipment in Flemish Dentists," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:11:p:5617-:d:561353
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/11/5617/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/11/5617/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zubick, H.H. & Tolentino, A.T. & Boffa, J., 1980. "Hearing loss and the high speed dental handpiece," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 70(6), pages 633-635.
    2. Sridhar Krishnamurti, 2009. "Sensorineural Hearing Loss Associated with Occupational Noise Exposure: Effects of Age-Corrections," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-11, February.
    3. Kuen Wai Ma & Hai Ming Wong & Cheuk Ming Mak, 2017. "Dental Environmental Noise Evaluation and Health Risk Model Construction to Dental Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohannad Nassar & Md Sofiqul Islam & Stancey D’souza & Milan Praveen & Mohammad Hani Al Masri & Salvatore Sauro & Ahmed Jamleh, 2023. "Tinnitus Prevalence and Associated Factors among Dental Clinicians in the United Arab Emirates," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-10, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hillary A. Snapp & Natasha Schaefer Solle & Barbara Millet & Suhrud M. Rajguru, 2022. "Subclinical Hearing Deficits in Noise-Exposed Firefighters," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-13, September.
    2. Ik-Hwan Kim & Hyeonmin Cho & Je Seon Song & Wonse Park & Yooseok Shin & Ko Eun Lee, 2022. "Assessment of Real-Time Active Noise Control Devices in Dental Treatment Conditions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-11, August.
    3. Chun-Yip Hon & Illia Tchernikov & Craig Fairclough & Alberto Behar, 2020. "Case Study in a Working Environment Highlighting the Divergence between Sound Level and Workers’ Perception towards Noise," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-11, August.
    4. Pengpeng Xie & Yong Peng & Tiantian Wang & Honghao Zhang, 2019. "Risks of Ear Complaints of Passengers and Drivers While Trains Are Passing Through Tunnels at High Speed: A Numerical Simulation and Experimental Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Sedina Kalender Smajlović & Andreja Kukec & Mateja Dovjak, 2019. "Association between Sick Building Syndrome and Indoor Environmental Quality in Slovenian Hospitals: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Mohannad Nassar & Md Sofiqul Islam & Stancey D’souza & Milan Praveen & Mohammad Hani Al Masri & Salvatore Sauro & Ahmed Jamleh, 2023. "Tinnitus Prevalence and Associated Factors among Dental Clinicians in the United Arab Emirates," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-10, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:11:p:5617-:d:561353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.