IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i11p5568-d560482.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sexist Myths Emergency Healthcare Professionals and Factors Associated with the Detection of Intimate Partner Violence in Women

Author

Listed:
  • Encarnación Martínez-García

    (Guadix High Resolution Hospital, 18500 Granada, Spain
    Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain)

  • Verónica Montiel-Mesa

    (Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Andalusian Health Service, 18014 Granada, Spain)

  • Belén Esteban-Vilchez

    (San Cecilio Clinical Hospital, Andalusian Health Service, 18016 Granada, Spain)

  • Beatriz Bracero-Alemany

    (The Inmaculate Clinic, Andalusian Health Service, 18004 Granada, Spain)

  • Adelina Martín-Salvador

    (Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, 52005 Melilla, Spain)

  • María Gázquez-López

    (Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, 51001 Ceuta, Spain)

  • María Ángeles Pérez-Morente

    (Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain)

  • María Adelaida Alvarez-Serrano

    (Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, 51001 Ceuta, Spain)

Abstract

This study analysed the capacity of emergency physicians and nurses working in the city of Granada (Spain) to respond to intimate partner violence (IPV) against women, and the mediating role of certain factors and opinions towards certain sexist myths in the detection of cases. This is a cross-sectional study employing the physician readiness to manage intimate partner violence survey (PREMIS) between October 2020 and January 2021, with 164 surveys analysed. Descriptive and analytical statistics were applied, designing three multivariate regression models by considering opinions about different sexist myths. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were considered for the detection of cases. In the past six months, 34.8% of professionals reported that they had identified some cases of IPV, particularly physicians (OR = 2.47, 95% CI = 1.14–5.16; OR = 2.65, 95% CI = 1.26–5.56). Those who did not express opinions towards sexist myths related to the understanding of the victim or the consideration of alcohol/drug abuse as the main causes of violence and showed a greater probability of detecting a case (NS) (OR = 1.26 and OR = 1.65, respectively). In order to confirm the indicia found, further research is required, although there tends to be a common opinion towards the certain sexual myth of emergency department professionals not having an influence on IPV against women.

Suggested Citation

  • Encarnación Martínez-García & Verónica Montiel-Mesa & Belén Esteban-Vilchez & Beatriz Bracero-Alemany & Adelina Martín-Salvador & María Gázquez-López & María Ángeles Pérez-Morente & María Adelaida Alv, 2021. "Sexist Myths Emergency Healthcare Professionals and Factors Associated with the Detection of Intimate Partner Violence in Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-15, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:11:p:5568-:d:560482
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/11/5568/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/11/5568/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eva Sundborg & Lena Törnkvist & Nouha Saleh‐Stattin & Per Wändell & Ingrid Hylander, 2017. "To ask, or not to ask: the hesitation process described by district nurses encountering women exposed to intimate partner violence," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(15-16), pages 2256-2265, August.
    2. Kathryn Hinsliff‐Smith & Julie McGarry, 2017. "Understanding management and support for domestic violence and abuse within emergency departments: A systematic literature review from 2000–2015," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4013-4027, December.
    3. Irfan Ahmad & Parveen Azam Ali & Salma Rehman & Ashfaque Talpur & Katie Dhingra, 2017. "Intimate partner violence screening in emergency department: a rapid review of the literature," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(21-22), pages 3271-3285, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Inger Wallin Lundell & Louise Eulau & Frida Bjarneby & Margareta Westerbotn, 2018. "Women's experiences with healthcare professionals after suffering from gender‐based violence: An interview study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 949-957, March.
    2. Fortuna Procentese & Immacolata Di Napoli & Filomena Tuccillo & Alessandra Chiurazzi & Caterina Arcidiacono, 2019. "Healthcare Professionals’ Perceptions and Concerns towards Domestic Violence during Pregnancy in Southern Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-17, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:11:p:5568-:d:560482. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.