IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i10p5466-d558413.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Does Metro Maintenance Staff’s Risk Perception Influence Safety Citizenship Behavior—The Mediating Role of Safety Attitude

Author

Listed:
  • Huaiyuan Zhai

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Mengjie Li

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
    School of Economics and Management, Cangzhou Jiaotong College, Cangzhou 061199, China)

  • Shengyue Hao

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Mingli Chen

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Lingchen Kong

    (School of Science, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

Abstract

The accident rate is high in subway maintenance work, and most of the accidents are caused by human factors, especially the lack of sensitivity to risk perception, the lack of rigorous attitude towards safety and the lack of safe citizenship behavior (SCB). Therefore, it is very important to study the risk perception (RP), safety attitude (SA) and SCB of metro maintenance staff in order to reduce the accident rate. In order to reduce human errors and accidents, this study analyzed the influence of metro maintenance staff’s RP on their SCB and the mediating role of SA. Based on previous studies, this paper uses the risk perception scale, safety attitude scale and safety citizenship behavior scale as research tools. A survey was administered at the Subway Company, and altogether 268 valid questionnaires were used, and the data were analyzed by SPSS19.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) and AMOS 24.0 (IBM, Armonk, New York, NY, USA). The result reveals that SA plays a complete mediating role between metro maintenance staff’s RP and their SCB; and SA has a positive influence on SCB; RP has a positive influence on SA; and SA positively predicts SCB.

Suggested Citation

  • Huaiyuan Zhai & Mengjie Li & Shengyue Hao & Mingli Chen & Lingchen Kong, 2021. "How Does Metro Maintenance Staff’s Risk Perception Influence Safety Citizenship Behavior—The Mediating Role of Safety Attitude," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:10:p:5466-:d:558413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/10/5466/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/10/5466/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Arbuckle & Lois Morton & Jon Hobbs, 2013. "Farmer beliefs and concerns about climate change and attitudes toward adaptation and mitigation: Evidence from Iowa," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 118(3), pages 551-563, June.
    2. Paul Slovic & Melissa L. Finucane & Ellen Peters & Donald G. MacGregor, 2004. "Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(2), pages 311-322, April.
    3. Xiangcheng Meng & Huaiyuan Zhai & Alan H. S. Chan, 2019. "Development of Scales to Measure and Analyse the Relationship of Safety Consciousness and Safety Citizenship Behaviour of Construction Workers: An Empirical Study in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Lu Peng & Alan H.S. Chan, 2019. "Exerting Explanatory Accounts of Safety Behavior of Older Construction Workers within the Theory of Planned Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Mengjie Li & Huaiyuan Zhai & Junjie Zhang & Xiangcheng Meng, 2020. "Research on the Relationship Between Safety Leadership, Safety Attitude and Safety Citizenship Behavior of Railway Employees," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-17, March.
    6. Margôt Kuttschreuter, 2006. "Psychological Determinants of Reactions to Food Risk Messages," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 1045-1057, August.
    7. Guo, Shengyu & Zhang, Pan & Ding, Lieyun, 2019. "Time-statistical laws of workers’ unsafe behavior in the construction industry: A case study," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 515(C), pages 419-429.
    8. Lennart Sjöberg, 1998. "Worry and Risk Perception," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), pages 85-93, February.
    9. C. M. Tam & Ivan Fung & Albert Chan, 2001. "Study of attitude changes in people after the implementation of a new safety management system: the supervision plan," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 393-403.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Wenhao & Wang, Yanhui & Wang, Guangxing & Li, Man & Jia, Limin, 2023. "Identification of the critical accident causative factors in the urban rail transit system by complex network theory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 610(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mengjie Li & Huaiyuan Zhai & Junjie Zhang & Xiangcheng Meng, 2020. "Research on the Relationship Between Safety Leadership, Safety Attitude and Safety Citizenship Behavior of Railway Employees," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Xiangcheng Meng & Alan H. S. Chan, 2022. "Cross-Regional Research in Demographic Impact on Safety Consciousness and Safety Citizenship Behavior of Construction Workers: A Comparative Study between Mainland China and Hong Kong," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Tianjun Feng & L. Robin Keller & Ping Wu & Yifan Xu, 2014. "An Empirical Study of the Toxic Capsule Crisis in China: Risk Perceptions and Behavioral Responses," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(4), pages 698-710, April.
    4. Stephanie Moser & Susanne Elisabeth Bruppacher & Hans‐Joachim Mosler, 2011. "How People Perceive and Will Cope with Risks from the Diffusion of Ubiquitous Information and Communication Technologies," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 832-846, May.
    5. Vicki S. Freimuth & Amelia Jamison & Gregory Hancock & Donald Musa & Karen Hilyard & Sandra Crouse Quinn, 2017. "The Role of Risk Perception in Flu Vaccine Behavior among African‐American and White Adults in the United States," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(11), pages 2150-2163, November.
    6. Marchel Bentoy & Marlon Mata & Jayson Bayogo & Roel Vasquez & Rose Mary Almacen & Samantha Shane Evangelista & Charldy Wenceslao & Jannen Batoon & Maria Diana Lauro & Kafferine Yamagishi & Gamaliel Go, 2022. "Complex Cause-Effect Relationships of Social Capital, Leader-Member Exchange, and Safety Behavior of Workers in Small-Medium Construction Firms and the Moderating Role of Age," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, September.
    7. Heather Rosoff & Richard S. John & Fynnwin Prager, 2012. "Flu, Risks, and Videotape: Escalating Fear and Avoidance," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(4), pages 729-743, April.
    8. Xiangcheng Meng & Alan H. S. Chan, 2021. "Current States and Future Trends in Safety Research of Construction Personnel: A Quantitative Analysis Based on Social Network Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-17, January.
    9. Ewa Lechowska, 2022. "Approaches in research on flood risk perception and their importance in flood risk management: a review," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 111(3), pages 2343-2378, April.
    10. T. Terpstra & R. Zaalberg & J. de Boer & W. J. W. Botzen, 2014. "You Have Been Framed! How Antecedents of Information Need Mediate the Effects of Risk Communication Messages," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(8), pages 1506-1520, August.
    11. Junjie Zhang & Huaiyuan Zhai & Xiangcheng Meng & Wanxue Wang & Lei Zhou, 2020. "Influence of Social Safety Capital on Safety Citizenship Behavior: The Mediation of Autonomous Safety Motivation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, January.
    12. Raman Kachurka & Michał W. Krawczyk & Joanna Rachubik, 2021. "Persuasive messages will not raise COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Evidence from a nation-wide online experiment," Working Papers 2021-07, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    13. James K. Hammitt, 2020. "Valuing mortality risk in the time of COVID-19," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 61(2), pages 129-154, October.
    14. Scorgie, Fiona & Khoza, Nomhle & Delany-Moretlwe, Sinead & Velloza, Jennifer & Mangxilana, Nomvuyo & Atujuna, Millicent & Chitukuta, Miria & Matambanadzo, Kudzai V. & Hosek, Sybil & Makhale, Lerato & , 2021. "Narrative sexual histories and perceptions of HIV risk among young women taking PrEP in southern Africa: Findings from a novel participatory method," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    15. Kang, Min Jung & Park, Heejun, 2011. "Impact of experience on government policy toward acceptance of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles in Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3465-3475, June.
    16. Branden B. Johnson, 2017. "Explaining Americans’ responses to dread epidemics: an illustration with Ebola in late 2014," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(10), pages 1338-1357, October.
    17. Joanna Sokolowska & Patrycja Sleboda, 2015. "The Inverse Relation Between Risks and Benefits: The Role of Affect and Expertise," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(7), pages 1252-1267, July.
    18. Robinson, Angela & Covey, Judith & Spencer, Anne & Loomes, Graham, 2010. "Are some deaths worse than others? The effect of 'labelling' on people's perceptions," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 444-455, June.
    19. Femke Hilverda & Margôt Kuttschreuter, 2018. "Online Information Sharing About Risks: The Case of Organic Food," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(9), pages 1904-1920, September.
    20. Kai Greenlees & Randolph Cornelius, 2021. "The promise of panarchy in managed retreat: converging psychological perspectives and complex adaptive systems theory," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 11(3), pages 503-510, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:10:p:5466-:d:558413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.