IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i10p5324-d556204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Despite the Differences, We Were All the Same”. Group Cohesion in Diagnosis-Specific and Transdiagnostic CBT Groups for Anxiety and Depression: A Qualitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Bryde Christensen

    (Research Unit for Psychotherapy & Psychopathology, Psychiatry West, Region Zealand, 4200 Slagelse, Denmark)

  • Signe Wahrén

    (Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, 1353 København K, Denmark)

  • Nina Reinholt

    (Research Unit for Psychotherapy & Psychopathology, Psychiatry West, Region Zealand, 4200 Slagelse, Denmark)

  • Stig Poulsen

    (Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, 1353 København K, Denmark)

  • Morten Hvenegaard

    (Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark, 2200 København N, Denmark)

  • Erik Simonsen

    (Psychiatric Research Unit, Region Zealand, 4200 Slagelse, Denmark
    Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2200 København N, Denmark)

  • Sidse Arnfred

    (Research Unit for Psychotherapy & Psychopathology, Psychiatry West, Region Zealand, 4200 Slagelse, Denmark
    Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2200 København N, Denmark)

Abstract

Group cohesion refers to a sense of belonging, mutual support and identification with other group members. Group cohesion has been associated with better outcomes, lower drop-out rates, more interpersonal support and better participation in psychotherapy. Nevertheless, the role of group cohesion in CBT has not yet received much attention. The rationale for delivering CBT in groups is that patients can model themselves through each other due to their similarities in symptoms. However, there has recently been a shift towards transdiagnostic CBT protocols, in which patients with varied diagnoses participate in the same groups. This shift challenges the rationale of delivering CBT in groups, and it is therefore highly important to understand if and how group cohesion develops in mixed diagnoses CBT groups. The current study used a qualitative comparative framework to investigate the patients’ experiences of group cohesion in diagnosis-specific versus transdiagnostic CBT groups. Twenty-three patients were interviewed with semi-structured interviews upon completion of the treatment. Participants had a primary diagnosis of MDD, panic disorder, agoraphobia or social anxiety disorder. A comparative thematic analysis was carried out. Three themes were found: the move from differences to similarities , the role of group cohesion in group CBT and factors helpful and hindering to group cohesion. Group cohesion developed across groups and was considered highly important in both diagnosis-specific and transdiagnostic CBT groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Bryde Christensen & Signe Wahrén & Nina Reinholt & Stig Poulsen & Morten Hvenegaard & Erik Simonsen & Sidse Arnfred, 2021. "“Despite the Differences, We Were All the Same”. Group Cohesion in Diagnosis-Specific and Transdiagnostic CBT Groups for Anxiety and Depression: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:10:p:5324-:d:556204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/10/5324/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/10/5324/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kyung-O Kim & Jae-Hyeong Ryu & Hae-Ryong Chung & Marcia K. Butler & Deborah Gritzmacher, 2021. "Understanding the Life, Pain, and Barriers to Physical Activity in Korean Patients with Panic Disorder: Photovoice Inquiry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-18, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:10:p:5324-:d:556204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.