Author
Listed:
- Georgia Fasoi
(Department of Nursing, School of Health and Care Sciences, University of West Attica, 12243 Athens, Greece)
- Eirini C. Patsiou
(Intensive Care Unit, General Hospital Korgialenio-Benakio E.E.S, 11526 Athens, Greece)
- Areti Stavropoulou
(Department of Nursing, School of Health and Care Sciences, University of West Attica, 12243 Athens, Greece)
- Evridiki Kaba
(Department of Nursing, School of Health and Care Sciences, University of West Attica, 12243 Athens, Greece)
- Dimitrios Papageorgiou
(Department of Nursing, School of Health and Care Sciences, University of West Attica, 12243 Athens, Greece)
- Georgia Toylia
(Department of Nursing, School of Health and Care Sciences, University of West Attica, 12243 Athens, Greece)
- Aspasia Goula
(Department of Business Administration, School of Administrative, Economics and Social Sciences, University of West Attica, 12243 Athens, Greece)
- Martha Kelesi
(Department of Nursing, School of Health and Care Sciences, University of West Attica, 12243 Athens, Greece)
Abstract
Introduction: Nursing activities score scales are valuable instruments for assessing the quality of nursing care provided in critically ill patients and easy to use in validating nurse staffing. The aim of this study was the assessment of nursing workload (NW) as a predictive factor of mortality by using the nursing activities score (NAS) scale. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study of 91 days during 2019, convenience sampling was employed to recruit 82 registered nurses (RN) from three intensive care units (ICUs) of two public hospitals with 41 beds in total. Data were collected using the NAS scale, the researcher’s observation, the information given by the staff, and the nursing care reports. Descriptive and inductive statistics were used with significance level α = 0.05. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS 25.0) was used for analyzing the data. Results: Females were the majority of the sample (84.1%), with a mean age of 38.9 (7.7) years, 87.8% had a nursing degree from a technological educational institute (T.E.I), the average working experience was 14 (8.1) years and the ICU experience was 12.9 (8.5) years. There were 3764 daily records of NAS with an average of 54.81 (2.34) and total NAS of 756.51 (150.27). The NW of the first day’s admission in the ICU was 65.15 (13.05), NW was 13.15 h/day and the NW of patients who died was 57.37 (4.06). The optimal nurse/patient ratio (NPR) was 1:1.82, while the existing NPR was 1:2.86. The mortality rate was 28.7%. Conclusion: Although the study results did not demonstrate a significant correlation between NW and mortality, the NW in ICU appeared to be relatively higher for patients who died than for those who survived. This result may serve as an indication for a positive correlation between these two variables. In addition, NW was found to be moderate, while one ICU nurse can take care of more than one patient.
Suggested Citation
Georgia Fasoi & Eirini C. Patsiou & Areti Stavropoulou & Evridiki Kaba & Dimitrios Papageorgiou & Georgia Toylia & Aspasia Goula & Martha Kelesi, 2020.
"Assessment of Nursing Workload as a Mortality Predictor in Intensive Care Units (ICU) Using the Nursing Activities Score (NAS) Scale,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-12, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2020:i:1:p:79-:d:467678
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Sabina Krupa & Ozga Dorota & Adriano Friganovic & Wioletta Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska & Krzysztof Jurek, 2021.
"The Polish Version of the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (NuDESC PL)-Experience of Using in Nursing Practice in Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Unit,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-11, September.
- Mercedes Fernández-Castro & José-María Jiménez & Belén Martín-Gil & María-Fé Muñoz-Moreno & María-José Castro & María-José Cao & María López, 2021.
"The Impact of COVID-19 on Levels of Adherence to the Completion of Nursing Records for Inpatients in Isolation,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-8, October.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2020:i:1:p:79-:d:467678. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.