IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i9p3071-d351567.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Inventory of European Birth Cohorts

Author

Listed:
  • Claudia Pansieri

    (Department of Public Health, Laboratory for Mother and Child Health, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, 20156 Milan, Italy)

  • Chiara Pandolfini

    (Department of Public Health, Laboratory for Mother and Child Health, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, 20156 Milan, Italy)

  • Antonio Clavenna

    (Department of Public Health, Laboratory for Mother and Child Health, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, 20156 Milan, Italy)

  • Imti Choonara

    (Academic Division of Child Health, University of Nottingham School of Medicine, Derby DE22 3DT, UK)

  • Maurizio Bonati

    (Department of Public Health, Laboratory for Mother and Child Health, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, 20156 Milan, Italy)

Abstract

Many birth cohorts have been carried out. We performed a review of European birth cohorts to see the countries involved, provide a panorama of the current research topics and design, and, more generally, provide input for those creating collaborations and laying out guidelines aimed at unifying cohort methodologies to enable data merging and maximize knowledge acquisition. We searched PubMed and Embase for articles referring to longitudinal, prospective European birth cohorts and searched online cohort inventories. We found references to 111 birth cohorts, 45 of which began enrolment at birth. These cohorts began between 1921 and 2015 and represented 19 countries, with varying sample sizes (236 to 21,000 children). As of 5 January 2020, were still recruiting. The main areas addressed were allergic diseases (14 cohorts) and environmental exposure (f12 cohorts) and most cohorts were publicly funded. Given the large costs of running cohorts and the importance of long follow-up periods in identifying the risk factors for disorders thought to have a perinatal/early life etiology, current cohorts must be designed to answer research questions considering several aspects, from genetic ones to psychological, social, and environmental ones. Furthermore, universally recognized methodological aspects are needed to permit the comparison and merging of cohort data.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudia Pansieri & Chiara Pandolfini & Antonio Clavenna & Imti Choonara & Maurizio Bonati, 2020. "An Inventory of European Birth Cohorts," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-17, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:9:p:3071-:d:351567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/9/3071/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/9/3071/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rachel Cernansky, 2017. "US child-health study rises from ashes of high-profile failure," Nature, Nature, vol. 542(7640), pages 149-149, February.
    2. Helen Pearson, 2015. "Massive UK baby study cancelled," Nature, Nature, vol. 526(7575), pages 620-621, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chiara Pandolfini & Cristian Ricci & Linda Precious Siziba & Sebastian Huhn & Jon Genuneit & Maurizio Bonati, 2021. "Intrauterine Exposures and Maternal Health Status during Pregnancy in Relation to Later Child Health: A Review of Pregnancy Cohort Studies in Europe," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-16, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:9:p:3071-:d:351567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.