IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i9p3065-d351704.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Anesthesia Surrendering Instrument

Author

Listed:
  • Hanna Lee

    (Department of Nursing, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Wonju-si 26403, Korea)

  • Ji-Soon Kang

    (Department of Nursing, Hansei University, Gunpo-si 43742, Korea)

  • Jeong-Won Han

    (College of Nursing Science, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea)

Abstract

This study examined the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the anesthesia surrendering instrument (ASI), which was originally developed to measure anesthesia surrendering in Swedish adults. The study population consisted of 306 patients who received general anesthesia for abdominal, breast, knee, hip, lower back, or shoulder surgery in ten hospitals across five regions of Korea from June to September 2019. The validity of the content, construct, and criterion used, and the reliability of the ASI were assessed. The results showed that the instrument had appropriate content validity; the item-level content validity index ranged between 0.80 and 1.00, and the scale-level content validity index was 0.90. The construct validity test results confirmed four sub-categories with a total of 26 items, and the internal consistency reliability tests showed Cronbach’s alpha values ranging between 0.71 and 0.88. The study findings confirmed the applicability of this instrument for measuring anesthesia surrendering in Korean adults. These results provide a foundation for future studies on anesthesia surrendering in Korean adult patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanna Lee & Ji-Soon Kang & Jeong-Won Han, 2020. "Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Anesthesia Surrendering Instrument," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-11, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:9:p:3065-:d:351704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/9/3065/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/9/3065/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yen‐Han Lee & Ting Fang Alvin Ang & Timothy C. Chiang & Warren A. Kaplan, 2018. "Growing concerns and controversies to Taiwan's National Health Insurance—what are the lessons from mainland China, South Korea and Singapore?," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 357-366, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ru-Yu Huang & Ting-Ting Lee & Yi-Hsien Lin & Chieh-Yu Liu & Hsiu-Chun Wu & Shu-He Huang, 2022. "Factors Related to Family Caregivers’ Readiness for the Hospital Discharge of Advanced Cancer Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Ta-Peng Wu & Cheng-Hung Tsai & Yu-Ting Su & Chu-Chiao Wang & Tzeng-Ji Chen & Ching-Mao Chang & Fang-Pey Chen, 2018. "The Evaluation of Professional Divisions of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Taiwan through Patient Visit Records of 2012," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-13, September.
    3. Hung-Yu Wang & Joh-Jong Huang & Shu-Fang Su & Sheng-Hao Hsu & Li-Shiu Chou & Frank Huang-Chih Chou, 2020. "From folk therapy to evidence-based psychiatry practice: The benefit of evidence-based psychiatry in treatment-naive psychotic patients," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 66(6), pages 593-599, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:9:p:3065-:d:351704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.