IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i9p3031-d351116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing Activity and Participation between Acquired Brain Injury and Spinal-Cord Injury in Community-Dwelling People with Severe Disability Using WHODAS 2.0

Author

Listed:
  • Seo Yeon Yoon

    (Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Bundang Jesaeng General Hospital, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do 13590, Korea)

  • Ja-Ho Leigh

    (Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Korea
    Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Korea Workers’ Compensation and Welfare Incheon Hospital, Incheon 21417, Korea)

  • Jieun Lee

    (Department of Health Convergence, Graduate School of Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Korea)

  • Wan Ho Kim

    (Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul 01022, Korea)

Abstract

Central-nervous-system (CNS) injuries constitute a significant cause of morbidity (often resulting in long-term disability) and mortality. This cross-sectional study compared the activity and participation of community-dwelling people with severe disability from acquired brain injuries (ABI) ( n = 322) and spinal-cord injuries (SCI) ( n = 183) to identify risk factors related to disability. Data were collected through a questionnaire survey of community-dwelling people with severe disability attending 65 healthcare centers. The survey included the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) and sociodemographic factors. We categorized a registered grade of disability of 1 or 2 as severe disability. WHODAS 2.0 domain and summary scores were compared between the ABI and SCI groups, and risk factors associated with disability were identified through regression analysis. ABI participants had significantly higher disability in cognition and relationships, whereas patients with SCI had higher disability in mobility ( p < 0.05). Onset duration was negatively correlated with cognition, relationships, participation, and summary scores in ABI participants ( p < 0.05). Neither group’s socioeconomic factors were associated with WHODA 2.0 scores. Understanding the different patterns of disability between SCI and ABI in community-dwelling people with severe disability helps establish future plans for the management of health resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Seo Yeon Yoon & Ja-Ho Leigh & Jieun Lee & Wan Ho Kim, 2020. "Comparing Activity and Participation between Acquired Brain Injury and Spinal-Cord Injury in Community-Dwelling People with Severe Disability Using WHODAS 2.0," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-10, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:9:p:3031-:d:351116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/9/3031/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/9/3031/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chia-Ying Kuo & Tsan-Hon Liou & Kwang-Hwa Chang & Wen-Chou Chi & Reuben Escorpizo & Chia-Feng Yen & Hua-Fang Liao & Hung-Yi Chiou & Wen-Ta Chiu & Jo-Ting Tsai, 2015. "Functioning and Disability Analysis of Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury and Spinal Cord Injury by Using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-12, April.
    2. Yi Cai & Samuel D. Towne & C. Scott Bickel, 2019. "Multi-Level Factors Associated with Social Participation among Stroke Survivors: China’s Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (2011–2015)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-11, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hana Ko, 2021. "Daily Time Use by Activity of Community-Dwelling Older Koreans: Focus on Health Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-12, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:9:p:3031-:d:351116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.