IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i8p2760-d346375.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Sleeping Patterns in Health and Academic Performance Among University Students

Author

Listed:
  • María Dolores Toscano-Hermoso

    (Faculty of Nursing, Department of Nursing, University of Huelva, 21007 Huelva, Spain)

  • Félix Arbinaga

    (Faculty of Education, Psychology and Sports Science, Department of Clinical and Experimental Psychology, University of Huelva, 21007 Huelva, Spain)

  • Eduardo J. Fernández-Ozcorta

    (Department of Physical Activity and Sports, Center for University Studies Cardenal Spínola CEU, University of Seville attached centre, 41930 Bormujos, Spain)

  • Juan Gómez-Salgado

    (School of Labour Sciences, Department of Sociology, Social Work and Public Health, University of Huelva, 21007 Huelva, Spain
    Safety and Health Posgrade Program, University Espiritu Santo, 092301 Guayaquil, Ecuador)

  • Carlos Ruiz-Frutos

    (School of Labour Sciences, Department of Sociology, Social Work and Public Health, University of Huelva, 21007 Huelva, Spain
    Safety and Health Posgrade Program, University Espiritu Santo, 092301 Guayaquil, Ecuador)

Abstract

Sleep problems in university students are important and have implications for health, quality of life, and academic performance. Using an ex post facto design, a total sample of 855 students (55.7% women) participated in the study. Sleep assessment was conducted using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, the Nightmare Frequency Scale, the Nightmare Proneness Scale, and the Composite Morningness Scale. Women show a higher risk [OR = 2.61] of presenting poor sleep quality (> 5 points on the PSQI) compared with men ( p < 0.001). Similarly, women reported a greater frequency of nightmares ( p < 0.001, d = 0.60), greater propensity for nightmares ( p < 0.001, d = 0.70) and a higher score on Item-5h of the PSQI regarding nightmares ( p < 0.001, d = 0.59). Women, compared with men, show higher risk [OR = 2.84] for a sleep disorder related to nightmares ( p = 0.012). Women need more time to reach a state of alertness after getting up ( p = 0.022), and there was an interaction between sex and the alertness factor when evaluating the subjective quality of sleep ( p = 0.030). Women show worse sleep quality and a higher frequency and propensity for suffering nightmares. When considering the relationship between sleep quality and academic performance, it is observed that students with poor sleep quality obtain lower academic scores (M = 7.21, SD = 0.805) than those with good sleep quality (M = 7.32, SD = 0.685), an effect that reaches significance ( t = 2.116, p = 0.035). Regarding the relationship between the categorized chronotype and academic performance, students with a morning chronotype achieve better academic results (M = 7.41, SD = 0.89) than their evening counterparts (M = 7.15, SD = 0.76), although these differences have a small effect size ( d = 0.31).

Suggested Citation

  • María Dolores Toscano-Hermoso & Félix Arbinaga & Eduardo J. Fernández-Ozcorta & Juan Gómez-Salgado & Carlos Ruiz-Frutos, 2020. "Influence of Sleeping Patterns in Health and Academic Performance Among University Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-11, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:8:p:2760-:d:346375
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/8/2760/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/8/2760/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Johanna Marie Schmickler & Simon Blaschke & Rebecca Robbins & Filip Mess, 2023. "Determinants of Sleep Quality: A Cross-Sectional Study in University Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-17, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:8:p:2760-:d:346375. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.