Author
Listed:
- Hae Won Kim
(Seoul National University, College of Nursing, Research Institute of Nursing Science, Seoul 03080, Korea)
- Duck Hee Kim
(College of Nursing, Woosuk University, Jeollabuk-do 55338, Korea)
- Hyang Yuol Lee
(College of Nursing, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea)
- Young Jin Lee
(College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Korea)
- Hye Young Ahn
(College of Nursing, Eulji University, Daejeon 34824, Korea)
Abstract
The fastest aging society with the lowest fertility rate can be buffered by support for healthy pregnancies using sociocultural approaches. We aimed to address adult perceptions of a healthy pregnancy and explored their needs and concerns about childbirth across the lifespan. We conducted a qualitative study using content analysis to investigate general perceptions of a healthy pregnancy after focus-group interviews with adult men and women. We interviewed 60 participants in nine group sessions of 5 to 8 people per group. Three major themes emerged that affect healthy pregnancies: Taking responsibility for a prepared pregnancy, factors that interfere with a healthy pregnancy, and improving strategies for a healthy pregnancy. For the first theme, the two main concerns were financial and parenthood preparation. Factors interfering with a healthy pregnancy had direct and indirect causes, considering personal, social, and cultural changes. Strategies for a healthy pregnancy included family and workplace support, systematic education, and governmental support for financial preparation and health screening. Participants averred that various kinds of support (financial, healthcare, and career) are needed for a healthy pregnancy and childbirth. This public awareness could promote better decisions toward healthy pregnancy with more sociocultural approaches in the various settings of home, school, and the workplace.
Suggested Citation
Hae Won Kim & Duck Hee Kim & Hyang Yuol Lee & Young Jin Lee & Hye Young Ahn, 2020.
"Adult Perceptions of Healthy Pregnancy: A Focus-Group Study,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-13, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:7:p:2460-:d:341292
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:7:p:2460-:d:341292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.