IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i7p2371-d339433.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Study of Dietary Patterns by Living Arrangements: The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2013–2015

Author

Listed:
  • Namhee Kim

    (College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea)

  • Go-Un Kim

    (College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea)

  • Heejung Kim

    (College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea
    Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea)

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the dietary patterns of Koreans, comparing them according to their living arrangements, and to determine factors associated with the patterns. We analyzed nutritional data of 6719 Korean adults aged 19–64 years from the 2013–2015 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey using the exploratory factor and hierarchical and k-means cluster analyses. We used multinominal logistic regression to compare factors associated with each dietary pattern. We identified three dietary patterns based on meal preference and dessert type: “traditional meal with healthy dessert”, “meal only”, and “unhealthy dessert” (Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin = 0.90, Bartlett’s test of sphericity p < 0.001). The “unhealthy dessert” dietary pattern was more frequent in people living alone (51.7%) than in those living with others (41.8%). Weight control, dining out, eating breakfast, and sleep were significantly associated with the “meal only”; eating breakfast was associated with the “unhealthy dessert” dietary pattern among those living alone. Lifestyle factors were associated with unhealthy dietary patterns in Korean adults living alone, warranting the need for a healthy diet and promotion of modifiable health behaviors for this subgroup. Thus, clinicians must provide comprehensive assessments and multidimensional interventions while considering lifestyle factors and unhealthy dietary patterns to improve the health status of them.

Suggested Citation

  • Namhee Kim & Go-Un Kim & Heejung Kim, 2020. "Comparative Study of Dietary Patterns by Living Arrangements: The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2013–2015," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:7:p:2371-:d:339433
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/7/2371/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/7/2371/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jing Sun & Nicholas J. Buys & Andrew P. Hills, 2014. "Dietary Pattern and Its Association with the Prevalence of Obesity, Hypertension and Other Cardiovascular Risk Factors among Chinese Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao Hu & Lulu Qin & Huilan Xu, 2017. "One-Year Results of a Synthetic Intervention Model for the Primary Prevention of T2D among Elderly Individuals with Prediabetes in Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Małgorzata Godala & Michalina Krzyżak & Dominik Maślach & Ewelina Gaszyńska, 2022. "Relationship between Dietary Behaviors and Physical Activity and the Components of Metabolic Syndrome: A Case-Control Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-11, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:7:p:2371-:d:339433. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.