IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i6p2103-d335515.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

External Workload Can Be Anticipated During 5 vs. 5 Games-Based Drills in Basketball Players: An Exploratory Study

Author

Listed:
  • Cody J. O’Grady

    (School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD 4702, Australia
    Human Exercise and Training Laboratory, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD 4702, Australia)

  • Vincent J. Dalbo

    (School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD 4702, Australia
    Human Exercise and Training Laboratory, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD 4702, Australia)

  • Masaru Teramoto

    (Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA)

  • Jordan L. Fox

    (School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD 4702, Australia
    Human Exercise and Training Laboratory, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD 4702, Australia)

  • Aaron T. Scanlan

    (School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD 4702, Australia
    Human Exercise and Training Laboratory, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD 4702, Australia)

Abstract

This study determined whether external workload could be anticipated during 5 vs. 5 games-based drills in basketball. Thirteen semi-professional, male basketball players were monitored during 5 vs. 5 training drills across the season. External workload was determined using PlayerLoad™ (AU∙min −1 ). The reference workload for each drill was calculated across all sessions, using bootstrapping. The bootstrap mean workload and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were then calculated for session 1, sessions 1–2, and continued for remaining sessions (1–3, 1–4, etc.), and were compared with those of the reference workload. The minimum sessions to anticipate workload for each drill was identified when the first normative value fell within ±5% or ±10% of the reference workload 95% CI. The minimum sessions were then tested to determine the accuracy to which workload could be anticipated. Three to four sessions were needed to anticipate workload within ±5%, while 2–3 sessions were needed to anticipate workload within ±10%. External workload was anticipated in 0–55% of future sessions using an error range of ±5%, and in 58–89% of sessions using an error range of ±10%. External workload during 5 vs. 5 games-based drills can be anticipated in most sessions using normative values established during a short-term monitoring period with an error range of ±10%.

Suggested Citation

  • Cody J. O’Grady & Vincent J. Dalbo & Masaru Teramoto & Jordan L. Fox & Aaron T. Scanlan, 2020. "External Workload Can Be Anticipated During 5 vs. 5 Games-Based Drills in Basketball Players: An Exploratory Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-11, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:6:p:2103-:d:335515
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/6/2103/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/6/2103/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:6:p:2103-:d:335515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.