IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i6p2061-d334872.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Logic Model for Evaluation and Planning in an Adult Day Care for Disabled Japanese Old People

Author

Listed:
  • Takashi Naruse

    (Department of Community Health Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
    School of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, The University of Queensland, At Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia)

  • Ayaka Kitano

    (Analytics & Innovation Department, Business Development Division, SMS Co., Ltd., 2-11-1 Shibakouen, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-0011, Japan)

  • Hiroshige Matsumoto

    (Department of Community Health Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan)

  • Satoko Nagata

    (Faculty of Nursing and Medical Care, Keio University, 4411 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-0883, Japan)

Abstract

Adult day care (ADC) provides various services for meeting clients’ needs. Based on the mini-Delphi method with 46 ADC staff and the discussions with eight ADC administrators, this study developed and finalized a comprehensive logic model to represent the elements of ADC. For the three basic structures of a logic model—inputs/activities, outputs, and outcomes—the model contained seven core categories and 23 sub-categories. The ADC inputs/activities consisted of two core categories: “Place to stay” and “Intervention from staff”. These inputs/activities caused two kinds of outputs: “Clients’ experiences” and “Families’ experiences”. “Accumulating experiences” with repeated ADC visits was established as the link between the ADC outputs and outcomes, which were “Clients’ change” and “Families’ change”. ADC centers provide various experiences for their clients and their caregivers, ranging from the fulfillment of needs for fundamental care to psychiatric care and self-actualization. Improving various model-related inputs/interventions can produce better experiences and outcomes. The model can guide ADC administrators, policymakers, and researchers in the evaluation of a heterogeneous ADC service program that is community-based, thereby ensuring optimal care for clients with an efficient use of resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Takashi Naruse & Ayaka Kitano & Hiroshige Matsumoto & Satoko Nagata, 2020. "A Logic Model for Evaluation and Planning in an Adult Day Care for Disabled Japanese Old People," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-10, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:6:p:2061-:d:334872
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/6/2061/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/6/2061/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Takashi Naruse & Masakazu Hatsushi & Junichi Kato, 2022. "Experiences of Disabled Older Adults in Tokyo’s Adult Day Care Centers during COVID-19—A Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-13, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:6:p:2061-:d:334872. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.