IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i5p1769-d330177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Protective Factors in Resilient Volunteers Facing Compassion Fatigue

Author

Listed:
  • Rosaura Gonzalez-Mendez

    (Departamento de Psicología Cognitiva, Social y Organizacional, Universidad de La Laguna, 38200 La Laguna, Canary Islands, Spain)

  • Matilde Díaz

    (Departamento de Psicología Cognitiva, Social y Organizacional, Universidad de La Laguna, 38200 La Laguna, Canary Islands, Spain)

  • Laura Aguilera

    (Departamento de Psicología Cognitiva, Social y Organizacional, Universidad de La Laguna, 38200 La Laguna, Canary Islands, Spain)

  • Julia Correderas

    (Departamento de Psicología Cognitiva, Social y Organizacional, Universidad de La Laguna, 38200 La Laguna, Canary Islands, Spain)

  • Yanira Jerez

    (Departamento de Psicología Cognitiva, Social y Organizacional, Universidad de La Laguna, 38200 La Laguna, Canary Islands, Spain)

Abstract

Volunteers may be exposed to the negative consequences of dealing with human suffering, such as compassion fatigue. However, very little is known about the protective factors that contribute to their resilience. The aim of this study was to analyze the extent to which different strengths (psychological endurance, purpose, and social support), orientations to happiness, and compassion satisfaction predict volunteers’ resilient outcomes (subjective well-being and post-traumatic growth) and compassion fatigue. Participants were 116 Spanish Red Cross volunteers (77.8% women). They were separately classified into three groups (low, medium, and high) according to the 33rd and 66th percentile scores on each resilient outcome. Univariate analyses of variance and post-hoc comparisons computed separately showed significant differences in most factors analyzed, except compassion fatigue. Logistic regressions revealed that endurance, organization support, and eudaimonia allowed for the correct classification of 83.3% of those high in post-traumatic growth (82.2% of the true-positives and 84.4% of the true-negatives). In addition to endurance and organization support, purpose was the strongest predictor of well-being (85.7% were correctly classified, 82.8% of the true-negatives and 88.2% of the true-positives). Finally, lower endurance predicted compassion fatigue (65.7% and 61.3% of the true-negatives and 69.4% of the true-positives). Findings indicate ways to promote resilience among volunteers.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosaura Gonzalez-Mendez & Matilde Díaz & Laura Aguilera & Julia Correderas & Yanira Jerez, 2020. "Protective Factors in Resilient Volunteers Facing Compassion Fatigue," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-10, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:5:p:1769-:d:330177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/5/1769/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/5/1769/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eleni Roditi & Moran Bodas & Eli Jaffe & Haim Y. Knobler & Bruria Adini, 2019. "Impact of Stressful Events on Motivations, Self-Efficacy, and Development of Post-Traumatic Symptoms among Youth Volunteers in Emergency Medical Services," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-12, May.
    2. Jacobien Niebuur & Aart C. Liefbroer & Nardi Steverink & Nynke Smidt, 2019. "Translation and Validation of the Volunteer Functions Inventory (VFI) among the General Dutch Older Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-14, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yanwei Sun & Dazhuo Mo & Ting Nie, 2022. "Employee Adversarial Growth Driven by Organizational Learning in the Chinese Pharmaceutical Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-13, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pierluigi Diotaiuti & Stefania Mancone & Stefano Corrado, 2022. "Motivations and Personal Traits Can Predict Self-Efficacy of the Clown Therapist: A Descriptive Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Mercy Gloria Ashepet & Liesbet Vranken & Caroline Michellier & Olivier Dewitte & Rodgers Mutyebere & Clovis Kabaseke & Ronald Twongyirwe & Violet Kanyiginya & Grace Kagoro-Rugunda & Tine Huyse & Liesb, 2024. "Assessing scale reliability in citizen science motivational research: lessons learned from two case studies in Uganda," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Jacobien Niebuur & Aart C. Liefbroer & Nardi Steverink & Nynke Smidt, 2019. "The Dutch Comparative Scale for Assessing Volunteer Motivations among Volunteers and Non-Volunteers: An Adaptation of the Volunteer Functions Inventory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:5:p:1769-:d:330177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.