IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i5p1649-d328010.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Mental Effort for Creating Mobile Data Collection Applications

Author

Listed:
  • Johannes Schobel

    (Institute of Medical Systems Biology, Ulm University, 89069 Ulm, Germany
    Institute of Databases and Information Systems, Ulm University, 89069 Ulm, Germany)

  • Thomas Probst

    (Department for Psychotherapy and Biopsychosocial Health, Danube University Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria)

  • Manfred Reichert

    (Institute of Databases and Information Systems, Ulm University, 89069 Ulm, Germany)

  • Winfried Schlee

    (Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany)

  • Marc Schickler

    (Institute of Databases and Information Systems, Ulm University, 89069 Ulm, Germany)

  • Hans A. Kestler

    (Institute of Medical Systems Biology, Ulm University, 89069 Ulm, Germany)

  • Rüdiger Pryss

    (Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Würzburg, 97070 Würzburg, Germany)

Abstract

To deal with drawbacks of paper-based data collection procedures, the QuestionSys approach empowers researchers with none or little programming knowledge to flexibly configure mobile data collection applications on demand. The mobile application approach of QuestionSys mainly pursues the goal to mitigate existing drawbacks of paper-based collection procedures in mHealth scenarios. Importantly, researchers shall be enabled to gather data in an efficient way. To evaluate the applicability of QuestionSys, several studies have been carried out to measure the efforts when using the framework in practice. In this work, the results of a study that investigated psychological insights on the required mental effort to configure the mobile applications are presented. Specifically, the mental effort for creating data collection instruments is validated in a study with N = 80 participants across two sessions. Thereby, participants were categorized into novices and experts based on prior knowledge on process modeling, which is a fundamental pillar of the developed approach. Each participant modeled 10 instruments during the course of the study, while concurrently several performance measures are assessed (e.g., time needed or errors). The results of these measures are then compared to the self-reported mental effort with respect to the tasks that had to be modeled. On one hand, the obtained results reveal a strong correlation between mental effort and performance measures. On the other, the self-reported mental effort decreased significantly over the course of the study, and therefore had a positive impact on measured performance metrics. Altogether, this study indicates that novices with no prior knowledge gain enough experience over the short amount of time to successfully model data collection instruments on their own. Therefore, QuestionSys is a helpful instrument to properly deal with large-scale data collection scenarios like clinical trials.

Suggested Citation

  • Johannes Schobel & Thomas Probst & Manfred Reichert & Winfried Schlee & Marc Schickler & Hans A. Kestler & Rüdiger Pryss, 2020. "Measuring Mental Effort for Creating Mobile Data Collection Applications," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-16, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:5:p:1649-:d:328010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/5/1649/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/5/1649/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Johannes Schobel & Madeleine Volz & Katharina Hörner & Peter Kuhn & Franz Jobst & Julian D. Schwab & Nensi Ikonomi & Silke D. Werle & Axel Fürstberger & Klaus Hoenig & Hans A. Kestler, 2021. "Supporting Medical Staff from Psycho-Oncology with Smart Mobile Devices: Insights into the Development Process and First Results," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-20, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:5:p:1649-:d:328010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.