IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i5p1612-d327455.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Privacy-Preserving Process Mining in Healthcare

Author

Listed:
  • Anastasiia Pika

    (School of Information Systems, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4000, QLD, Australia)

  • Moe T. Wynn

    (School of Information Systems, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4000, QLD, Australia)

  • Stephanus Budiono

    (School of Information Systems, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4000, QLD, Australia)

  • Arthur H.M. ter Hofstede

    (School of Information Systems, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4000, QLD, Australia)

  • Wil M.P. van der Aalst

    (School of Information Systems, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4000, QLD, Australia
    RWTH Aachen University, Process and Data Science Group, 52062 Aachen, Germany)

  • Hajo A. Reijers

    (School of Information Systems, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4000, QLD, Australia
    Utrecht University, Department of Information and Computing Sciences, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Process mining has been successfully applied in the healthcare domain and has helped to uncover various insights for improving healthcare processes. While the benefits of process mining are widely acknowledged, many people rightfully have concerns about irresponsible uses of personal data. Healthcare information systems contain highly sensitive information and healthcare regulations often require protection of data privacy. The need to comply with strict privacy requirements may result in a decreased data utility for analysis. Until recently, data privacy issues did not get much attention in the process mining community; however, several privacy-preserving data transformation techniques have been proposed in the data mining community. Many similarities between data mining and process mining exist, but there are key differences that make privacy-preserving data mining techniques unsuitable to anonymise process data (without adaptations). In this article, we analyse data privacy and utility requirements for healthcare process data and assess the suitability of privacy-preserving data transformation methods to anonymise healthcare data. We demonstrate how some of these anonymisation methods affect various process mining results using three publicly available healthcare event logs. We describe a framework for privacy-preserving process mining that can support healthcare process mining analyses. We also advocate the recording of privacy metadata to capture information about privacy-preserving transformations performed on an event log.

Suggested Citation

  • Anastasiia Pika & Moe T. Wynn & Stephanus Budiono & Arthur H.M. ter Hofstede & Wil M.P. van der Aalst & Hajo A. Reijers, 2020. "Privacy-Preserving Process Mining in Healthcare," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-28, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:5:p:1612-:d:327455
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/5/1612/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/5/1612/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maikel Luis Kolling & Leonardo B. Furstenau & Michele Kremer Sott & Bruna Rabaioli & Pedro Henrique Ulmi & Nicola Luigi Bragazzi & Leonel Pablo Carvalho Tedesco, 2021. "Data Mining in Healthcare: Applying Strategic Intelligence Techniques to Depict 25 Years of Research Development," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-20, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:5:p:1612-:d:327455. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.